Literature DB >> 27840556

Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Audrey K Kittredge1, Gary S Dell2.   

Abstract

The language production and perception systems rapidly learn novel phonotactic constraints. In production, for example, producing syllables in which /f/ is restricted to onset position (e.g. as /h/ is in English) causes one's speech errors to mirror that restriction. We asked whether or not perceptual experience of a novel phonotactic distribution transfers to production. In three experiments, participants alternated hearing and producing strings of syllables. In the same condition, the production and perception trials followed identical phonotactics (e.g. /f/ is onset). In the opposite condition, they followed reverse constraints (e.g. /f/ is onset for production, but /f/ is coda for perception). The tendency for speech errors to follow the production constraint was diluted when the opposite pattern was present on perception trials, thus demonstrating transfer of learning from perception to production. Transfer only occurred for perceptual tasks that may involve internal production, including an error monitoring task, which we argue engages production via prediction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implicit learning; language perception; language production; phonotactics; speech errors; transfer of learning

Year:  2015        PMID: 27840556      PMCID: PMC5102624          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  59 in total

Review 1.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 2.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

3.  Implicit perceptual anticipation triggered by statistical learning.

Authors:  Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Brian J Scholl; Marcia K Johnson; Marvin M Chun
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

5.  Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake--but only for skilled producers.

Authors:  Nivedita Mani; Falk Huettig
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Learning artificial phonotactic constraints: time course, durability, and relationship to natural constraints.

Authors:  Conrad F Taylor; George Houghton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 7.  The P-chain: relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Franklin Chang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Rapid access to speech gestures in perception: Evidence from choice and simple response time tasks.

Authors:  Carol A Fowler; Julie M Brown; Laura Sabadini; Jeffrey Weihing
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Slips of the tongue.

Authors:  D S Boomer; J D Laver
Journal:  Br J Disord Commun       Date:  1968-04

10.  Phonological errors in aphasic naming: comprehension, monitoring and lexicality.

Authors:  L Nickels; D Howard
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  5 in total

1.  Early phonology revealed by international adoptees' birth language retention.

Authors:  Jiyoun Choi; Mirjam Broersma; Anne Cutler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of consolidation in learning context-dependent phonotactic patterns in speech and digital sequence production.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Anderson; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Novel stress phonotactics are learnable by English speakers: Novel tone phonotactics are not.

Authors:  Yuan Bian; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-02

4.  Behavioral and Neurodynamic Effects of Word Learning on Phonotactic Repair.

Authors:  David W Gow; Adriana Schoenhaut; Enes Avcu; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-10

5.  Early development of abstract language knowledge: evidence from perception-production transfer of birth-language memory.

Authors:  Jiyoun Choi; Anne Cutler; Mirjam Broersma
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.