Literature DB >> 20438279

A vowel is a vowel: generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.

Kyle E Chambers1, Kristine H Onishi, Cynthia Fisher.   

Abstract

Adults can learn novel phonotactic constraints from brief listening experience. We investigated the representations underlying phonotactic learning by testing generalization to syllables containing new vowels. Adults heard consonant-vowel-consonant study syllables in which particular consonants were artificially restricted to the onset or coda position (e.g., /f/ is an onset, /s/ is a coda). Subjects were quicker to repeat novel constraint-following (legal) than constraint-violating (illegal) test syllables whether they contained a vowel used in the study syllables (training vowel) or a new (transfer) vowel. This effect emerged regardless of the acoustic similarity between training and transfer vowels. Listeners thus learned and generalized phonotactic constraints that can be characterized as simple first-order constraints on consonant position. Rapid generalization independent of vowel context provides evidence that vowels and consonants are represented independently by processes underlying phonotactic learning. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20438279      PMCID: PMC2864940          DOI: 10.1037/a0018991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  24 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: an empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production.

Authors:  C T Kello; D C Plaut; B MacWhinney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-09

3.  Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: effects of phonotactic probability and onset density.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch; Jonna Armbruster; Shinying Chu
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting.

Authors:  Meghan Sumner; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Effects of Attention on the Strength of Lexical Influences on Speech Perception: Behavioral Experiments and Computational Mechanisms.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James L McClelland; Lori L Holt; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-03

6.  Sensorimotor adaptation in speech production.

Authors:  J F Houde; M I Jordan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Wordshape errors in language production.

Authors:  J P Stemberger
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1990-05

8.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Learning phonology with substantive bias: an experimental and computational study of velar palatalization.

Authors:  Colin Wilson
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-09-10

10.  Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model.

Authors:  P A Luce; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Robust speech perception: recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.

Authors:  Dave F Kleinschmidt; T Florian Jaeger
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Learning to speak by listening: Transfer of phonotactics from perception to production.

Authors:  Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.

Authors:  Jill A Warker; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  An onset is an onset: Evidence from abstraction of newly-learned phonotactic constraints.

Authors:  Amélie Bernard
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Representations for phonotactic learning in infancy.

Authors:  Kyle E Chambers; Kristine H Onishi; Cynthia Fisher
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2011-10-12

7.  Phonemes: Lexical access and beyond.

Authors:  Nina Kazanina; Jeffrey S Bowers; William Idsardi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.