Literature DB >> 22486821

New environmental metabarcodes for analysing soil DNA: potential for studying past and present ecosystems.

Laura S Epp1, Sanne Boessenkool, Eva P Bellemain, James Haile, Alfonso Esposito, Tiayyba Riaz, Christer Erséus, Vladimir I Gusarov, Mary E Edwards, Arild Johnsen, Hans K Stenøien, Kristian Hassel, Håvard Kauserud, Nigel G Yoccoz, Kari Anne Bråthen, Eske Willerslev, Pierre Taberlet, Eric Coissac, Christian Brochmann.   

Abstract

Metabarcoding approaches use total and typically degraded DNA from environmental samples to analyse biotic assemblages and can potentially be carried out for any kinds of organisms in an ecosystem. These analyses rely on specific markers, here called metabarcodes, which should be optimized for taxonomic resolution, minimal bias in amplification of the target organism group and short sequence length. Using bioinformatic tools, we developed metabarcodes for several groups of organisms: fungi, bryophytes, enchytraeids, beetles and birds. The ability of these metabarcodes to amplify the target groups was systematically evaluated by (i) in silico PCRs using all standard sequences in the EMBL public database as templates, (ii) in vitro PCRs of DNA extracts from surface soil samples from a site in Varanger, northern Norway and (iii) in vitro PCRs of DNA extracts from permanently frozen sediment samples of late-Pleistocene age (~16,000-50,000 years bp) from two Siberian sites, Duvanny Yar and Main River. Comparison of the results from the in silico PCR with those obtained in vitro showed that the in silico approach offered a reliable estimate of the suitability of a marker. All target groups were detected in the environmental DNA, but we found large variation in the level of detection among the groups and between modern and ancient samples. Success rates for the Pleistocene samples were highest for fungal DNA, whereas bryophyte, beetle and bird sequences could also be retrieved, but to a much lesser degree. The metabarcoding approach has considerable potential for biodiversity screening of modern samples and also as a palaeoecological tool.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22486821     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05537.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  49 in total

1.  Long-lasting modification of soil fungal diversity associated with the introduction of rabbits to a remote sub-Antarctic archipelago.

Authors:  Johan Pansu; Richard C Winkworth; Françoise Hennion; Ludovic Gielly; Pierre Taberlet; Philippe Choler
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Residual soil DNA extraction increases the discriminatory power between samples.

Authors:  Jennifer M Young; Laura S Weyrich; Laurence J Clarke; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 2.007

Review 3.  The changing epitome of species identification - DNA barcoding.

Authors:  M Ajmal Ali; Gábor Gyulai; Norbert Hidvégi; Balázs Kerti; Fahad M A Al Hemaid; Arun K Pandey; Joongku Lee
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  A protocol for obtaining DNA barcodes from plant and insect fragments isolated from forensic-type soils.

Authors:  Kelly A Meiklejohn; Megan L Jackson; Libby A Stern; James M Robertson
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  DNA metabarcoding of orchid-derived products reveals widespread illegal orchid trade.

Authors:  Hugo J de Boer; Abdolbaset Ghorbani; Vincent Manzanilla; Ancuta-Cristina Raclariu; Anna Kreziou; Sarawut Ounjai; Maslin Osathanunkul; Barbara Gravendeel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

Authors:  Robert Lücking; M Catherine Aime; Barbara Robbertse; Andrew N Miller; Hiran A Ariyawansa; Takayuki Aoki; Gianluigi Cardinali; Pedro W Crous; Irina S Druzhinina; David M Geiser; David L Hawksworth; Kevin D Hyde; Laszlo Irinyi; Rajesh Jeewon; Peter R Johnston; Paul M Kirk; Elaine Malosso; Tom W May; Wieland Meyer; Maarja Öpik; Vincent Robert; Marc Stadler; Marco Thines; Duong Vu; Andrey M Yurkov; Ning Zhang; Conrad L Schoch
Journal:  IMA Fungus       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.515

Review 7.  Ancient and modern environmental DNA.

Authors:  Mikkel Winther Pedersen; Søren Overballe-Petersen; Luca Ermini; Clio Der Sarkissian; James Haile; Micaela Hellstrom; Johan Spens; Philip Francis Thomsen; Kristine Bohmann; Enrico Cappellini; Ida Bærholm Schnell; Nathan A Wales; Christian Carøe; Paula F Campos; Astrid M Z Schmidt; M Thomas P Gilbert; Anders J Hansen; Ludovic Orlando; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Fifty thousand years of Arctic vegetation and megafaunal diet.

Authors:  Eske Willerslev; John Davison; Mari Moora; Martin Zobel; Eric Coissac; Mary E Edwards; Eline D Lorenzen; Mette Vestergård; Galina Gussarova; James Haile; Joseph Craine; Ludovic Gielly; Sanne Boessenkool; Laura S Epp; Peter B Pearman; Rachid Cheddadi; David Murray; Kari Anne Bråthen; Nigel Yoccoz; Heather Binney; Corinne Cruaud; Patrick Wincker; Tomasz Goslar; Inger Greve Alsos; Eva Bellemain; Anne Krag Brysting; Reidar Elven; Jørn Henrik Sønstebø; Julian Murton; Andrei Sher; Morten Rasmussen; Regin Rønn; Tobias Mourier; Alan Cooper; Jeremy Austin; Per Möller; Duane Froese; Grant Zazula; François Pompanon; Delphine Rioux; Vincent Niderkorn; Alexei Tikhonov; Grigoriy Savvinov; Richard G Roberts; Ross D E MacPhee; M Thomas P Gilbert; Kurt H Kjær; Ludovic Orlando; Christian Brochmann; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 9.  Evolutionary Patterns and Processes: Lessons from Ancient DNA.

Authors:  Michela Leonardi; Pablo Librado; Clio Der Sarkissian; Mikkel Schubert; Ahmed H Alfarhan; Saleh A Alquraishi; Khaled A S Al-Rasheid; Cristina Gamba; Eske Willerslev; Ludovic Orlando
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 9.160

10.  Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.

Authors:  Meixi Lin; Ariel Levi Simons; Ryan J Harrigan; Emily E Curd; Fabian D Schneider; Dannise V Ruiz-Ramos; Zack Gold; Melisa G Osborne; Sabrina Shirazi; Teia M Schweizer; Tiara N Moore; Emma A Fox; Rachel Turba; Ana E Garcia-Vedrenne; Sarah K Helman; Kelsi Rutledge; Maura Palacios Mejia; Onny Marwayana; Miroslava N Munguia Ramos; Regina Wetzer; N Dean Pentcheff; Emily Jane McTavish; Michael N Dawson; Beth Shapiro; Robert K Wayne; Rachel S Meyer
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.