| Literature DB >> 25487334 |
Mikkel Winther Pedersen1, Søren Overballe-Petersen1, Luca Ermini1, Clio Der Sarkissian1, James Haile2, Micaela Hellstrom1, Johan Spens3, Philip Francis Thomsen1, Kristine Bohmann4, Enrico Cappellini1, Ida Bærholm Schnell5, Nathan A Wales1, Christian Carøe1, Paula F Campos1, Astrid M Z Schmidt1, M Thomas P Gilbert1, Anders J Hansen1, Ludovic Orlando1, Eske Willerslev6.
Abstract
DNA obtained from environmental samples such as sediments, ice or water (environmental DNA, eDNA), represents an important source of information on past and present biodiversity. It has revealed an ancient forest in Greenland, extended by several thousand years the survival dates for mainland woolly mammoth in Alaska, and pushed back the dates for spruce survival in Scandinavian ice-free refugia during the last glaciation. More recently, eDNA was used to uncover the past 50 000 years of vegetation history in the Arctic, revealing massive vegetation turnover at the Pleistocene/Holocene transition, with implications for the extinction of megafauna. Furthermore, eDNA can reflect the biodiversity of extant flora and fauna, both qualitatively and quantitatively, allowing detection of rare species. As such, trace studies of plant and vertebrate DNA in the environment have revolutionized our knowledge of biogeography. However, the approach remains marred by biases related to DNA behaviour in environmental settings, incomplete reference databases and false positive results due to contamination. We provide a review of the field.Entities:
Keywords: ancient; ancient DNA; environment; environmental DNA; review
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25487334 PMCID: PMC4275890 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8436 Impact factor: 6.237