Literature DB >> 34013632

Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.

Meixi Lin1, Ariel Levi Simons2,3, Ryan J Harrigan4, Emily E Curd1, Fabian D Schneider5, Dannise V Ruiz-Ramos6,7, Zack Gold1, Melisa G Osborne8, Sabrina Shirazi9, Teia M Schweizer1,10, Tiara N Moore1,11, Emma A Fox1, Rachel Turba1, Ana E Garcia-Vedrenne1, Sarah K Helman1, Kelsi Rutledge1, Maura Palacios Mejia1, Onny Marwayana1,12, Miroslava N Munguia Ramos1, Regina Wetzer13,14, N Dean Pentcheff13, Emily Jane McTavish7, Michael N Dawson7, Beth Shapiro9,15, Robert K Wayne1, Rachel S Meyer1,9.   

Abstract

Ecosystems globally are under threat from ongoing anthropogenic environmental change. Effective conservation management requires more thorough biodiversity surveys that can reveal system-level patterns and that can be applied rapidly across space and time. Using modern ecological models and community science, we integrate environmental DNA and Earth observations to produce a time snapshot of regional biodiversity patterns and provide multi-scalar community-level characterization. We collected 278 samples in spring 2017 from coastal, shrub, and lowland forest sites in California, a complex ecosystem and biodiversity hotspot. We recovered 16,118 taxonomic entries from eDNA analyses and compiled associated traditional observations and environmental data to assess how well they predicted alpha, beta, and zeta diversity. We found that local habitat classification was diagnostic of community composition and distinct communities and organisms in different kingdoms are predicted by different environmental variables. Nonetheless, gradient forest models of 915 families recovered by eDNA analysis and using BIOCLIM variables, Sentinel-2 satellite data, human impact, and topographical features as predictors, explained 35% of the variance in community turnover. Elevation, sand percentage, and photosynthetic activities (NDVI32) were the top predictors. In addition to this signal of environmental filtering, we found a positive relationship between environmentally predicted families and their numbers of biotic interactions, suggesting environmental change could have a disproportionate effect on community networks. Together, these analyses show that coupling eDNA with environmental predictors including remote sensing data has capacity to test proposed Essential Biodiversity Variables and create new landscape biodiversity baselines that span the tree of life.
© 2021 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beta diversity; biomonitoring; citizen science; community ecology; ecological modeling; environmental DNA; gradient forest; remote sensing; zeta diversity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34013632      PMCID: PMC9297316          DOI: 10.1002/eap.2379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   6.105


  66 in total

1.  Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment.

Authors:  A Sessitsch; A Weilharter; M H Gerzabek; H Kirchmann; E Kandeler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A comparison of taxon co-occurrence patterns for macro- and microorganisms.

Authors:  M Claire Horner-Devine; Jessica M Silver; Mathew A Leibold; Brendan J M Bohannan; Robert K Colwell; Jed A Fuhrman; Jessica L Green; Cheryl R Kuske; Jennifer B H Martiny; Gerard Muyzer; Lise Ovreås; Anna-Louise Reysenbach; Val H Smith
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.499

3.  Soil fungal diversity in natural grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: associations with plant diversity and productivity.

Authors:  Teng Yang; Jonathan M Adams; Yu Shi; Jin-Sheng He; Xin Jing; Litong Chen; Leho Tedersoo; Haiyan Chu
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Turnover of soil bacterial diversity driven by wide-scale environmental heterogeneity.

Authors:  L Ranjard; S Dequiedt; N Chemidlin Prévost-Bouré; J Thioulouse; N P A Saby; M Lelievre; P A Maron; F E R Morin; A Bispo; C Jolivet; D Arrouays; P Lemanceau
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 5.  The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection.

Authors:  S L Pimm; C N Jenkins; R Abell; T M Brooks; J L Gittleman; L N Joppa; P H Raven; C M Roberts; J O Sexton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Connecting Earth observation to high-throughput biodiversity data.

Authors:  Alex Bush; Rahel Sollmann; Andreas Wilting; Kristine Bohmann; Beth Cole; Heiko Balzter; Christopher Martius; András Zlinszky; Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer; Christina A Cobbold; Terence P Dawson; Brent C Emerson; Simon Ferrier; M Thomas P Gilbert; Martin Herold; Laurence Jones; Fabian H Leendertz; Louise Matthews; James D A Millington; John R Olson; Otso Ovaskainen; Dave Raffaelli; Richard Reeve; Mark-Oliver Rödel; Torrey W Rodgers; Stewart Snape; Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers; Alfried P Vogler; Piran C L White; Martin J Wooster; Douglas W Yu
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 15.460

7.  Terrestrial mammal surveillance using hybridization capture of environmental DNA from African waterholes.

Authors:  Peter Andreas Seeber; Gayle K McEwen; Ulrike Löber; Daniel W Förster; Marion Linda East; Jörg Melzheimer; Alex D Greenwood
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 7.090

Review 8.  Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change.

Authors:  Sandra Díaz; Josef Settele; Eduardo S Brondízio; Hien T Ngo; John Agard; Almut Arneth; Patricia Balvanera; Kate A Brauman; Stuart H M Butchart; Kai M A Chan; Lucas A Garibaldi; Kazuhito Ichii; Jianguo Liu; Suneetha M Subramanian; Guy F Midgley; Patricia Miloslavich; Zsolt Molnár; David Obura; Alexander Pfaff; Stephen Polasky; Andy Purvis; Jona Razzaque; Belinda Reyers; Rinku Roy Chowdhury; Yunne-Jai Shin; Ingrid Visseren-Hamakers; Katherine J Willis; Cynthia N Zayas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Aridity drives plant biogeographical sub regions in the Caatinga, the largest tropical dry forest and woodland block in South America.

Authors:  Augusto C Silva; Alexandre F Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Putting beta-diversity on the map: broad-scale congruence and coincidence in the extremes.

Authors:  Meghan W McKnight; Peter S White; Robert I McDonald; John F Lamoreux; Wes Sechrest; Robert S Ridgely; Simon N Stuart
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

1.  Landscape analyses using eDNA metabarcoding and Earth observation predict community biodiversity in California.

Authors:  Meixi Lin; Ariel Levi Simons; Ryan J Harrigan; Emily E Curd; Fabian D Schneider; Dannise V Ruiz-Ramos; Zack Gold; Melisa G Osborne; Sabrina Shirazi; Teia M Schweizer; Tiara N Moore; Emma A Fox; Rachel Turba; Ana E Garcia-Vedrenne; Sarah K Helman; Kelsi Rutledge; Maura Palacios Mejia; Onny Marwayana; Miroslava N Munguia Ramos; Regina Wetzer; N Dean Pentcheff; Emily Jane McTavish; Michael N Dawson; Beth Shapiro; Robert K Wayne; Rachel S Meyer
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 6.105

2.  Darwinian genomics and diversity in the tree of life.

Authors:  Taylorlyn Stephan; Shawn M Burgess; Hans Cheng; Charles G Danko; Clare A Gill; Erich D Jarvis; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; James E Koltes; Eric Lyons; Pamela Ronald; Oliver A Ryder; Lynn M Schriml; Pamela Soltis; Sue VandeWoude; Huaijun Zhou; Elaine A Ostrander; Elinor K Karlsson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.