Literature DB >> 29423711

A protocol for obtaining DNA barcodes from plant and insect fragments isolated from forensic-type soils.

Kelly A Meiklejohn1, Megan L Jackson2, Libby A Stern3, James M Robertson4.   

Abstract

Soil is often collected from a suspect's tire, vehicle, or shoes during a criminal investigation and subsequently submitted to a forensic laboratory for analysis. Plant and insect material recovered in such samples is rarely analyzed, as morphological identification is difficult. In this study, DNA barcoding was used for taxonomic identifications by targeting the gene regions known to permit discrimination in plants [maturase K (matK) and ribulose 1,5-biphosphate carboxylase (rbcL)] and insects [cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI)]. A DNA barcode protocol suitable for processing forensic-type biological fragments was developed and its utility broadly tested with forensic-type fragments (e.g., seeds, leaves, bark, head, legs; n, 213) isolated from soils collected within Virginia, USA (n, 11). Difficulties with PCR inhibitors in plant extracts and obtaining clean Sanger sequence data from insect amplicons were encountered during protocol development; however, the final protocol produced sequences specific to the expected locus and taxa. The overall quantity and quality of DNA extracted from the 213 forensic-type biological fragments was low (< 15 ng/μL). For plant fragments, only the rbcL sequence data was deemed reliable; thus, taxonomic identifications were limited to the family level. The majority of insect sequences matched COI in both GenBank and Barcode of Life DataSystems; however, they were identified as an undescribed environmental contaminant. Although limited taxonomic information was gleaned from the forensic-type fragments processed in this study, the new protocol shows promise for obtaining reliable and specific identifications through DNA barcoding, which could ultimately enhance the information gleaned from soil examinations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Forensic-type soils; Insects; Modified DNA barcoding protocol; Plants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29423711     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-018-1772-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  52 in total

1.  DNA barcoding as a tool for species identification in three forensic wildlife cases in South Africa.

Authors:  Desire L Dalton; Antoinette Kotze
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols in fresh and herbarium specimens of the genus Dalbergia.

Authors:  R A Ribeiro; M B Lovato
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2007-03-29

Review 3.  DNA barcodes for ecology, evolution, and conservation.

Authors:  W John Kress; Carlos García-Robledo; Maria Uriarte; David L Erickson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Forensic botany II, DNA barcode for land plants: Which markers after the international agreement?

Authors:  G Ferri; B Corradini; F Ferrari; A L Santunione; F Palazzoli; M Alu'
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.882

5.  Routine DNA barcoding of Canadian Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) reveals the invasive species Gracilaria vermiculophylla in British Columbia.

Authors:  Gary W Saunders
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  From barcoding single individuals to metabarcoding biological communities: towards an integrative approach to the study of global biodiversity.

Authors:  Melania E Cristescu
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  DNA barcoding Australia's fish species.

Authors:  Robert D Ward; Tyler S Zemlak; Bronwyn H Innes; Peter R Last; Paul D N Hebert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Inclusion of polyvinylpyrrolidone in the polymerase chain reaction reverses the inhibitory effects of polyphenolic contamination of RNA.

Authors:  P K Koonjul; W F Brandt; J M Farrant; G G Lindsey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Eric Coissac; Stéphanie Zundel; Tiayyba Riaz; Wasim Shehzad; Julien Bessière; Pierre Taberlet; François Pompanon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  DNA barcoding, species-specific PCR and real-time PCR techniques for the identification of six Tribolium pests of stored products.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Yi-Jiao Wang; Wei Guo; Dan Luo; Yi Wu; Zuzana Kučerová; Václav Stejskal; George Opit; Yang Cao; Fu-Jun Li; Zhi-Hong Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of BOLD and GenBank - Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials.

Authors:  Kelly A Meiklejohn; Natalie Damaso; James M Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Single Fragment or Bulk Soil DNA Metabarcoding: Which is Better for Characterizing Biological Taxa Found in Surface Soils for Sample Separation?

Authors:  Laura M Boggs; Melissa K R Scheible; Gustavo Machado; Kelly A Meiklejohn
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.096

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.