Literature DB >> 22482630

High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Xin Qian1, Andrew Tucker, Emily Gidcumb, Jing Shan, Guang Yang, Xiomara Calderon-Colon, Shabana Sultana, Jianping Lu, Otto Zhou, Derrek Spronk, Frank Sprenger, Yiheng Zhang, Don Kennedy, Tom Farbizio, Zhenxue Jing.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of increasing the system spatial resolution and scanning speed of Hologic Selenia Dimensions digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) scanner by replacing the rotating mammography x-ray tube with a specially designed carbon nanotube (CNT) x-ray source array, which generates all the projection images needed for tomosynthesis reconstruction by electronically activating individual x-ray sources without any mechanical motion. The stationary digital breast tomosynthesis (s-DBT) design aims to (i) increase the system spatial resolution by eliminating image blurring due to x-ray tube motion and (ii) reduce the scanning time. Low spatial resolution and long scanning time are the two main technical limitations of current DBT technology.
METHODS: A CNT x-ray source array was designed and evaluated against a set of targeted system performance parameters. Simulations were performed to determine the maximum anode heat load at the desired focal spot size and to design the electron focusing optics. Field emission current from CNT cathode was measured for an extended period of time to determine the stable life time of CNT cathode for an expected clinical operation scenario. The source array was manufactured, tested, and integrated with a Selenia scanner. An electronic control unit was developed to interface the source array with the detection system and to scan and regulate x-ray beams. The performance of the s-DBT system was evaluated using physical phantoms.
RESULTS: The spatially distributed CNT x-ray source array comprised 31 individually addressable x-ray sources covering a 30 angular span with 1 pitch and an isotropic focal spot size of 0.6 mm at full width at half-maximum. Stable operation at 28 kV(peak) anode voltage and 38 mA tube current was demonstrated with extended lifetime and good source-to-source consistency. For the standard imaging protocol of 15 views over 14, 100 mAs dose, and 2 × 2 detector binning, the projection resolution along the scanning direction increased from 4.0 cycles/mm [at 10% modulation-transfer-function (MTF)] in DBT to 5.1 cycles/mm in s-DBT at magnification factor of 1.08. The improvement is more pronounced for faster scanning speeds, wider angular coverage, and smaller detector pixel sizes. The scanning speed depends on the detector, the number of views, and the imaging dose. With 240 ms detector readout time, the s-DBT system scanning time is 6.3 s for a 15-view, 100 mAs scan regardless of the angular coverage. The scanning speed can be reduced to less than 4 s when detectors become faster. Initial phantom studies showed good quality reconstructed images.
CONCLUSIONS: A prototype s-DBT scanner has been developed and evaluated by retrofitting the Selenia rotating gantry DBT scanner with a spatially distributed CNT x-ray source array. Preliminary results show that it improves system spatial resolution substantially by eliminating image blur due to x-ray focal spot motion. The scanner speed of s-DBT system is independent of angular coverage and can be increased with faster detector without image degration. The accelerated lifetime measurement demonstrated the long term stability of CNT x-ray source array with typical clinical operation lifetime over 3 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22482630      PMCID: PMC3321055          DOI: 10.1118/1.3694667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography.

Authors:  S Suryanarayanan; A Karellas; S Vedantham; S J Glick; C J D'Orsi; S P Baker; R L Webber
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Tao Wu; Richard H Moore; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A comparative study of limited-angle cone-beam reconstruction methods for breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yiheng Zhang; Heang-Ping Chan; Berkman Sahiner; Jun Wei; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Oblique incidence effects in direct x-ray detectors: a first-order approximation using a physics-based analytical model.

Authors:  Aldo Badano; Melanie Freed; Yuan Fang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging.

Authors:  L T Niklason; B T Christian; L E Niklason; D B Kopans; D E Castleberry; B H Opsahl-Ong; C E Landberg; P J Slanetz; A A Giardino; R Moore; D Albagli; M C DeJule; P F Fitzgerald; D F Fobare; B W Giambattista; R F Kwasnick; J Liu; S J Lubowski; G E Possin; J F Richotte; C Y Wei; R F Wirth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Breast cancer mortality continues to decline in Wisconsin.

Authors:  T Cherney; P Remington
Journal:  WMJ       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

9.  Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations.

Authors:  J G Elmore; M B Barton; V M Moceri; S Polk; P J Arena; S W Fletcher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-04-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Xin Qian; Ramya Rajaram; Xiomara Calderon-Colon; Guang Yang; Tuyen Phan; David S Lalush; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  24 in total

1.  Stationary intraoral digital tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube X-ray source array.

Authors:  J Shan; A W Tucker; L R Gaalaas; G Wu; E Platin; A Mol; J Lu; O Zhou
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Estimating scatter from sparsely measured primary signal.

Authors:  Gongting Wu; Christina R Inscoe; Jabari Calliste; Jing Shan; Yueh Z Lee; Otto Zhou; Jianping Lu
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-03-29

Review 3.  A review of breast tomosynthesis. Part I. The image acquisition process.

Authors:  Ioannis Sechopoulos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dependency of image quality on system configuration parameters in a stationary digital breast tomosynthesis system.

Authors:  Andrew W Tucker; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Mark A Helvie; Scott Zelakiewicz; Andrea Schmitz; Mitra Noroozian; Chintana Paramagul; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Alexis V Nees; Colleen H Neal; Paul Carson; Yao Lu; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jun Wei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in multiscale bilateral filtering regularized reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volume.

Authors:  Ravi K Samala; Heang-Ping Chan; Yao Lu; Lubomir Hadjiiski; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Pilot study for compact microbeam radiation therapy using a carbon nanotube field emission micro-CT scanner.

Authors:  Mike Hadsell; Guohua Cao; Jian Zhang; Laurel Burk; Torsten Schreiber; Eric Schreiber; Sha Chang; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Carbon nanotube electron field emitters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Emily Gidcumb; Bo Gao; Jing Shan; Christy Inscoe; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Nanotechnology       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.874

9.  In Situ Field Emission of Carbon Nanotubes in Oxygen Using Environmental TEM and the Influence of the Imaging Electron Beam.

Authors:  Ai Leen Koh; Emily Gidcumb; Otto Zhou; Robert Sinclair
Journal:  Microsc Microanal       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.127

10.  Image-guided microbeam irradiation to brain tumour bearing mice using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Laurel M Burk; Christy R Inscoe; Michael J Hadsell; Pavel Chtcheprov; Yueh Z Lee; Jianping Lu; Sha Chang; Otto Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.