PURPOSE: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is defined as the use of parallel, microplanar x-ray beams with an energy spectrum between 50 and 300 keV for cancer treatment and brain radiosurgery. Up until now, the possibilities of MRT have mainly been studied using synchrotron sources due to their high flux (100s Gy/s) and approximately parallel x-ray paths. The authors have proposed a compact x-ray based MRT system capable of delivering MRT dose distributions at a high dose rate. This system would employ carbon nanotube (CNT) field emission technology to create an x-ray source array that surrounds the target of irradiation. Using such a geometry, multiple collimators would shape the irradiation from this array into multiple microbeams that would then overlap or interlace in the target region. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of attaining a high dose rate and parallel microbeam beams using such a system. METHODS: The microbeam dose distribution was generated by our CNT micro-CT scanner (100 μm focal spot) and a custom-made microbeam collimator. An alignment assembly was fabricated and attached to the scanner in order to collimate and superimpose beams coming from different gantry positions. The MRT dose distribution was measured using two orthogonal radiochromic films embedded inside a cylindrical phantom. This target was irradiated with microbeams incident from 44 different gantry angles to simulate an array of x-ray sources as in the proposed compact CNT-based MRT system. Finally, phantom translation in a direction perpendicular to the microplanar beams was used to simulate the use of multiple parallel microbeams. RESULTS: Microbeams delivered from 44 gantry angles were superimposed to form a single microbeam dose distribution in the phantom with a FWHM of 300 μm (calculated value was 290 μm). Also, during the multiple beam simulation, a peak to valley dose ratio of ~10 was found when the phantom translation distance was roughly 4x the beam width. The first prototype CNT-based x-ray tube dedicated to the development of compact MRT technology development was proposed and planned based on the preliminary experimental results presented here and the previous corresponding Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of creating microbeam dose distributions at a high dose rate using a proposed compact MRT system. The flexibility of CNT field emission x-ray sources could possibly bring compact and low cost MRT devices to the larger research community and assist in the translational research of this promising new approach to radiation therapy.
PURPOSE: Microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is defined as the use of parallel, microplanar x-ray beams with an energy spectrum between 50 and 300 keV for cancer treatment and brain radiosurgery. Up until now, the possibilities of MRT have mainly been studied using synchrotron sources due to their high flux (100s Gy/s) and approximately parallel x-ray paths. The authors have proposed a compact x-ray based MRT system capable of delivering MRT dose distributions at a high dose rate. This system would employ carbon nanotube (CNT) field emission technology to create an x-ray source array that surrounds the target of irradiation. Using such a geometry, multiple collimators would shape the irradiation from this array into multiple microbeams that would then overlap or interlace in the target region. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of attaining a high dose rate and parallel microbeam beams using such a system. METHODS: The microbeam dose distribution was generated by our CNT micro-CT scanner (100 μm focal spot) and a custom-made microbeam collimator. An alignment assembly was fabricated and attached to the scanner in order to collimate and superimpose beams coming from different gantry positions. The MRT dose distribution was measured using two orthogonal radiochromic films embedded inside a cylindrical phantom. This target was irradiated with microbeams incident from 44 different gantry angles to simulate an array of x-ray sources as in the proposed compact CNT-based MRT system. Finally, phantom translation in a direction perpendicular to the microplanar beams was used to simulate the use of multiple parallel microbeams. RESULTS: Microbeams delivered from 44 gantry angles were superimposed to form a single microbeam dose distribution in the phantom with a FWHM of 300 μm (calculated value was 290 μm). Also, during the multiple beam simulation, a peak to valley dose ratio of ~10 was found when the phantom translation distance was roughly 4x the beam width. The first prototype CNT-based x-ray tube dedicated to the development of compact MRT technology development was proposed and planned based on the preliminary experimental results presented here and the previous corresponding Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have demonstrated the feasibility of creating microbeam dose distributions at a high dose rate using a proposed compact MRT system. The flexibility of CNT field emission x-ray sources could possibly bring compact and low cost MRT devices to the larger research community and assist in the translational research of this promising new approach to radiation therapy.
Authors: G Cao; Y Z Lee; R Peng; Z Liu; R Rajaram; X Calderon-Colon; L An; P Wang; T Phan; S Sultana; D S Lalush; J P Lu; O Zhou Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jeffrey C Crosbie; Robin L Anderson; Kai Rothkamm; Christina M Restall; Leonie Cann; Saleela Ruwanpura; Sarah Meachem; Naoto Yagi; Imants Svalbe; Robert A Lewis; Bryan R G Williams; Peter A W Rogers Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: John Wong; Elwood Armour; Peter Kazanzides; Iulian Iordachita; Erik Tryggestad; Hua Deng; Mohammad Matinfar; Christopher Kennedy; Zejian Liu; Timothy Chan; Owen Gray; Frank Verhaegen; Todd McNutt; Eric Ford; Theodore L DeWeese Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Pavel Chtcheprov; Michael Hadsell; Laurel Burk; Rachel Ger; Lei Zhang; Hong Yuan; Yueh Z Lee; Sha Chang; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2013-03-15
Authors: Y Prezado; M Dos Santos; W Gonzalez; G Jouvion; C Guardiola; S Heinrich; D Labiod; M Juchaux; L Jourdain; C Sebrie; F Pouzoulet Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Elisabeth Schültke; Jacques Balosso; Thomas Breslin; Guido Cavaletti; Valentin Djonov; Francois Esteve; Michael Grotzer; Guido Hildebrandt; Alexander Valdman; Jean Laissue Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Johanna Winter; Marek Galek; Christoph Matejcek; Jan J Wilkens; Kurt Aulenbacher; Stephanie E Combs; Stefan Bartzsch Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-06-11
Authors: Alexander N Yakunin; Sergey V Zarkov; Yuri A Avetisyan; Garif G Akchurin; Nikolay P Aban'shin; Valery V Tuchin Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.576