PURPOSE: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with looped soft-tissue grafts, an interference screw is frequently used for tibial fixation. This study compared three alternatives thought to improve the initial mechanical properties of direct bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: suturing the graft to close the loop, adding a supplementary staple, or increasing the oversize of the screw diameter relative to the bone tunnel from 1 to 2 mm. METHODS: Twenty-eight porcine tibiae and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized into four testing groups: a base fixation using 10-mm-diameter screw with open-looped graft, base fixation supplemented by an extracortical staple, base fixation but closing the looped graft by suturing its ends, and base fixation but using an 11-mm screw. Graft and bone tunnel diameters were 9 mm in all specimens. Constructs were subjected to cyclic tensile load and finally pulled to failure to determine their structural properties. RESULTS: The main mode of failure in all groups was pull-out of tendon strands after slippage past the screw. The sutured graft group displayed significantly lower residual displacement (mean value reduction: 47-67 %) and higher yield load (mean value increase: 38-54 %) than any alternative tested. No other statistical differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Suturing a soft-tissue graft to form a closed loop enhanced the initial mechanical properties of tibial fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using a porcine model, and thus, this may be an efficient means to help in reducing post-operative laxity and early clinical failure. No mechanical improvement was observed for an open-looped tendon graft by adding an extracortical staple to supplement the screw fixation or by increasing the oversize of the screw to tunnel diameter from 1 to 2 mm.
PURPOSE: In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with looped soft-tissue grafts, an interference screw is frequently used for tibial fixation. This study compared three alternatives thought to improve the initial mechanical properties of direct bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: suturing the graft to close the loop, adding a supplementary staple, or increasing the oversize of the screw diameter relative to the bone tunnel from 1 to 2 mm. METHODS: Twenty-eight porcine tibiae and porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were randomized into four testing groups: a base fixation using 10-mm-diameter screw with open-looped graft, base fixation supplemented by an extracortical staple, base fixation but closing the looped graft by suturing its ends, and base fixation but using an 11-mm screw. Graft and bone tunnel diameters were 9 mm in all specimens. Constructs were subjected to cyclic tensile load and finally pulled to failure to determine their structural properties. RESULTS: The main mode of failure in all groups was pull-out of tendon strands after slippage past the screw. The sutured graft group displayed significantly lower residual displacement (mean value reduction: 47-67 %) and higher yield load (mean value increase: 38-54 %) than any alternative tested. No other statistical differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Suturing a soft-tissue graft to form a closed loop enhanced the initial mechanical properties of tibial fixation with a bioabsorbable interference screw in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions using a porcine model, and thus, this may be an efficient means to help in reducing post-operative laxity and early clinical failure. No mechanical improvement was observed for an open-looped tendon graft by adding an extracortical staple to supplement the screw fixation or by increasing the oversize of the screw to tunnel diameter from 1 to 2 mm.
Authors: Janne T Nurmi; Harri Sievänen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen; Teppo L N Järvinen Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2004 Apr-May Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Francisco Ezquerro; Ana Pérez de la Blanca; José Serrano-Fernandez; Fernando Nadal; Elvira Montañez-Heredia Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Antonio Herrera; Fernando Martínez; Daniel Iglesias; José Cegoñino; Elena Ibarz; Luis Gracia Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-06-30 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: John J Lee; Karimdad Otarodifard; Bong Jae Jun; Michelle H McGarry; George F Hatch; Thay Q Lee Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Linda Wild; Andreas Flury; Manuel Waltenspül; Christoph Zindel; Lazaros Vlachopoulos; Florian B Imhoff; Sandro F Fucentese Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 3.067
Authors: M Ettinger; T Werner-Lebeda; T Calliess; M Omar; C Becher; M Ezechieli; M Klintschar; M Petri Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-01-27 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Alejandro Espejo-Baena; Alejandro Espejo-Reina; Abel Gómez-Cáceres; Maria Josefa Espejo-Reina; Jaime Dalla Rosa-Nogales Journal: Arthrosc Tech Date: 2017-10-30
Authors: Fernando Pessoa Weiss; Felipe Augusto de Aguiar Possoli; Isabel Ziesemer Costa; Paulo César Borges; Edmar Stieven Filho; Luiz Fernando Kubrusly Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Date: 2019-12-13
Authors: Luis Antônio de Ridder Bauer; Hermes Augusto Agottani Alberti; Vitor Gustavo de Paiva Corotti; Ana Paula Gebert de Oliveira Franco; Edmar Stieven Filho; Luiz Antônio Munhoz da Cunha Journal: Rev Bras Ortop Date: 2018-07-27