Literature DB >> 35287180

Tibial tunnel enlargement is affected by the tunnel diameter-screw ratio in tibial hybrid fixation for hamstring ACL reconstruction.

Linda Wild1, Andreas Flury2, Manuel Waltenspül1, Christoph Zindel1, Lazaros Vlachopoulos1, Florian B Imhoff1, Sandro F Fucentese1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is no evidence on screw diameter with regards to tunnel size in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hybrid fixation devices. The hypothesis was that an undersized tunnel coverage by the tibial screw leads to subsequent tunnel enlargement in ACLR in hybrid fixation technique.
METHODS: In a retrospective case series, radiographs and clinical scores of 103 patients who underwent primary hamstring tendon ACLR with a hybrid fixation technique at the tibial site (interference screw and suspensory fixation) were obtained. Tunnel diameters in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured on radiographs 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. Tunnel enlargement of more than 10% between the two periods was defined as tunnel widening. Tunnel coverage ratio was calculated as the tunnel diameter covered by the screw in percentage.
RESULTS: Overall, tunnel widening 12 months postoperatively was 23.1 ± 17.1% and 24.2 ± 18.2% in the frontal and sagittal plane, respectively. Linear regression analysis revealed the tunnel coverage ratio to be a negative predicting risk factor for tunnel widening (p = 0.001). The ROC curve analysis provided an ideal cut-off for tunnel enlargement of > 10% at a tunnel coverage ratio of 70% (sensitivity 60%, specificity 81%, AUC 75%, p < 0.001). Patients (n = 53/103) with a tunnel coverage ratio of < 70% showed significantly higher tibial tunnel enlargement of 15% in the frontal and sagittal planes. The binary logistic regression showed a significant OR of 6.9 (p = 0.02) for tunnel widening > 10% in the frontal plane if the tunnel coverage ratio was < 70% (sagittal plane: OR 14.7, p = 0.001). Clinical scores did not correlate to tunnel widening.
CONCLUSION: Tibial tunnel widening was affected by the tunnel diameter coverage ratio. To minimize the likelihood of disadvantageous tunnel expansion-which is of importance in case of revision surgery-an interference screw should not undercut the tunnel diameter by more than 1 mm.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hybrid fixation; Interference screw; Tunnel diameter

Year:  2022        PMID: 35287180     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04408-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  30 in total

1.  Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  K E Webster; J A Feller; K A Hameister
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  Timothy C Wilson; Anthony Kantaras; Ahmet Atay; Darren L Johnson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Femoral tunnel enlargement after anatomic ACL reconstruction: a biological problem?

Authors:  Alcindo Silva; Ricardo Sampaio; Elisabete Pinto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Comparisons of femoral tunnel enlargement in 169 patients between single-bundle and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon grafts.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Kawaguchi; Eiji Kondo; Nobuto Kitamura; Shuken Kai; Masayuki Inoue; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  One-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Results According to Preoperative Bone Tunnel Diameter: Five to Fifteen-Year Follow-up.

Authors:  Kyoung Ho Yoon; Jung Suk Kim; Soo Yeon Park; Sang Eon Park
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Bone Grafting Technique Using an Allograft Bone Matrix.

Authors:  Jorge Chahla; Chase S Dean; Tyler R Cram; David Civitarese; Luke O'Brien; Samuel G Moulton; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-02-22

8.  Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft.

Authors:  C Fink; M Zapp; K P Benedetto; W Hackl; C Hoser; M Rieger
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Tendon healing in a bone tunnel differs at the tunnel entrance versus the tunnel exit: an effect of graft-tunnel motion?

Authors:  Scott A Rodeo; Sumito Kawamura; Hyon-Jeong Kim; Christian Dynybil; Liang Ying
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 10.  Failure rates of common grafts used in ACL reconstructions: a systematic review of studies published in the last decade.

Authors:  Gerwin Haybäck; Christoph Raas; Ralf Rosenberger
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-09-18       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.