Literature DB >> 23539173

Effect of suturing the femoral portion of a four-strand graft during an ACL reconstruction.

Lawrence Camarda1, Giuseppe Pitarresi, Salvatore Moscadini, Giuseppe Marannano, Antonino Sanfilippo, Michele D'Arienzo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A suture passed along the part of the graft that will be inserted into the femoral tunnel is widely used by surgeons, because it could prevent the graft sliding on the femoral fixation device during pulling from the tibial side. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical effects of suturing the intratunnel femoral part of the graft during an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Bovine digital extensor tendons and tibias were harvested from 20 fresh-frozen mature bovine knees ranging in age from 18 to 24 months. Quadruple-strand bovine tendons were passed through the tibial tunnel and secured distally with a bioabsorbable interference screw. In one half of all grafts (N = 10), the looped-over part of the graft was sutured in a whipstitch technique over a distance of 30 mm (Group 1). In one half of all grafts (N = 10), the looped-over part was left free from any suture (Group 2). The grafts were preconditioned at 50 N for 10 min, followed by cyclic loading at 1 Hz between 50 N and 250 N for 1,000 cycles. Load-to-failure test was then carried out at a rate of 1 mm/s.
RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between mean stiffness at pullout and yield load between the two groups. In all specimens on Group 1, failure occurred following to partial breaking and then slipping of the tendons between the screw and the tunnel. Concerning Group 2, in six cases failure occurred as described for Group 1 specimens. In the remaining four cases, failure occurred entirely through the ligament mid-substance.
CONCLUSIONS: Suturing in a whipstitch fashion the femoral portion of the graft doesn't affect the mechanical proprieties of the ACL graft. When suspension fixation device is used, suturing the looped-over part of the graft could be helpful in order to provide equal tension in all of the strands of the graft at time of tibial fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23539173     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2449-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  34 in total

1.  Mechanical behavior of two hamstring graft constructs for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  J Höher; S U Scheffler; J D Withrow; G A Livesay; R E Debski; F H Fu; S L Woo
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Assessment of morbidity of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  P T Simonian; S D Harrison; V J Cooley; E M Escabedo; D A Deneka; R V Larson
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  1997

3.  Outcomes and second-look arthroscopic evaluation after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of a single tibial tunnel.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Sang-Hee Choi; Joon Ho Wang; Jae Chul Yoo; Hyun Seok Yim; Moon Jong Chang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Volker Musahl; Volker Steuber; Daniel Kendoff; Dan Choi; Answorth A Allen; Andrew D Pearle; David W Altchek
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The interaction between the whipstitch sutures of multi-strand ACL grafts and interference screw fixation.

Authors:  Jonathan Bravman; Charbel Ishak; Jonathan Gelber; Suk Namkoong; Laith M Jazrawi; Frederick J Kummer
Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis       Date:  2006

6.  Modified Prusik knot versus whipstitch technique for soft tissue fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Dietmar Krappinger; Franz Sebastian Kralinger; Rene El Attal; Wolfgang Hackl; Christian Haid
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Tibiofemoral compression force differences using laxity- and force-based initial graft tensioning techniques in the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed cadaveric knee.

Authors:  Braden C Fleming; Mark F Brady; Michael P Bradley; Rahul Banerjee; Michael J Hulstyn; Paul D Fadale
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  Properties of growing trabecular ovine bone. Part I: mechanical and physical properties.

Authors:  A Nafei; C C Danielsen; F Linde; I Hvid
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-08

9.  Bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro comparison of mechanical behavior under failure tensile loading and cyclic submaximal tensile loading.

Authors:  Matthias Honl; Volker Carrero; Ekkehard Hille; Erich Schneider; Michael M Morlock
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Fixation strength of interference screw fixation in bovine, young human, and elderly human cadaver knees: influence of insertion torque, tunnel-bone block gap, and interference.

Authors:  G A Brown; F Peña; T Grøntvedt; D Labadie; L Engebretsen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  6 in total

1.  Preparation techniques for all-inside ACL cortical button grafts: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Raul Mayr; Christian Heinz Heinrichs; Martin Eichinger; Vinzenz Smekal; Werner Schmoelz; René Attal
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Surgical time for graft preparation using different suture techniques.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Sebastian Giambartino; Michele Lauria; Michele Saporito; Vito Triolo; Michele D'Arienzo
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-09-17

3.  The biomechanical effects of graft rotation on ACL reconstruction tunnel mismatch.

Authors:  Danilo Ricardo Okiishi de Oliveira; Eduardo Takahashi Garcia; Fernando Augusto Freitas Fuso; Cesar Augusto Martins Pereira; Marco Martins Lages; Adriano Marques de Almeida; Tiago Lazzaretti Fernandes; André Pedrinelli; Arnaldo José Hernandez
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Contamination occurs during ACL graft harvesting and manipulation, but it can be easily eradicated.

Authors:  Daniel Pérez-Prieto; María E Portillo; Raúl Torres-Claramunt; Xavier Pelfort; Pedro Hinarejos; Joan C Monllau
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Does thread shape affect the fixation strength of the bioabsorbable interference screws for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? A biomechanical study.

Authors:  Gerardo L Garcés; Oscar Martel; Alejandro Yánez; Alberto Cuadrado
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Similar biomechanical properties of four tripled tendon graft models for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Davide Pavan; Federica Morello; Francesco Monachino; Giuseppe Rovere; Lawrence Camarda; Giuseppe Pitarresi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 2.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.