Literature DB >> 22449134

Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.

Solène Kalénine1, Daniel Mirman, Erica L Middleton, Laurel J Buxbaum.   

Abstract

The current research aimed at specifying the activation time course of different types of semantic information during object conceptual processing and the effect of context on this time course. We distinguished between thematic and functional knowledge and the specificity of functional similarity. Two experiments were conducted with healthy older adults using eye tracking in a word-to-picture matching task. The time course of gaze fixations was used to assess activation of distractor objects during the identification of manipulable artifact targets (e.g., broom). Distractors were (a) thematically related (e.g., dustpan), (b) related by a specific function (e.g., vacuum cleaner), or (c) related by a general function (e.g., sponge). Growth curve analyses were used to assess competition effects when target words were presented in isolation (Experiment 1) and embedded in contextual sentences of different generality levels (Experiment 2). In the absence of context, there was earlier and shorter lasting activation of thematically related as compared to functionally related objects. The time course difference was more pronounced for general functions than specific functions. When contexts were provided, functional similarities that were congruent with context generality level increased in salience with earlier activation of those objects. Context had little impact on thematic activation time course. These data demonstrate that processing a single manipulable artifact concept implicitly activates thematic and functional knowledge with different time courses and that context speeds activation of context-congruent functional similarity. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22449134      PMCID: PMC3537173          DOI: 10.1037/a0027626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  47 in total

1.  Food for thought: cross-classification and category organization in a complex real-world domain.

Authors:  B H Ross; G L Murphy
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection.

Authors:  M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys; Sarah Edwards; Tracy Baker; Katherine Willson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Visual search is modulated by action intentions.

Authors:  Harold Bekkering; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

5.  Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action.

Authors:  Matthew Botvinick; David C Plaut
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of objects and events.

Authors:  David P Vinson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02

7.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Consuelo B Boronat; Laurel J Buxbaum; H Branch Coslett; Kathy Tang; Eleanor M Saffran; Daniel Y Kimberg; John A Detre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-07

8.  A basis for generating expectancies for verbs from nouns.

Authors:  Ken McRae; Mary Hare; Jeffrey L Elman; Todd Ferretti
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-10

9.  Toward an integrated account of object and action selection: a computational analysis and empirical findings from reaching-to-grasp and tool-use.

Authors:  Matthew M Botvinick; Laurel J Buxbaum; Lauren M Bylsma; Steven A Jax
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Eve Overton; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10
View more
  26 in total

1.  Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

Authors:  Qi Chen; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-08-23

2.  Impact of action primes on implicit processing of thematic and functional similarity relations: evidence from eye-tracking.

Authors:  Ewa Pluciennicka; Yannick Wamain; Yann Coello; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-16

Review 3.  Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Allison E Britt
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.

Authors:  Chia-lin Lee; Erica Middleton; Daniel Mirman; Solène Kalénine; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Effects of motion speed in action representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Laura J Speed; Vicky T Lai; Gabriella Vigliocco; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on Osiurak and Badets (2016).

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics.

Authors:  Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

9.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Kenneth I Vaden; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.

Authors:  Chia-Iin Lee; Daniel Mirman; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.