Literature DB >> 24746946

Abnormal dynamics of activation of object use information in apraxia: evidence from eyetracking.

Chia-Iin Lee1, Daniel Mirman2, Laurel J Buxbaum3.   

Abstract

Action representations associated with object use may be incidentally activated during visual object processing, and the time course of such activations may be influenced by lexical-semantic context (e.g., Lee, Middleton, Mirman, Kalénine, & Buxbaum (2012). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 257-270). In this study we used the "visual world" eye-tracking paradigm to examine whether a deficit in producing skilled object-use actions (apraxia) is associated with abnormalities in incidental activation of action information, and assessed the neuroanatomical substrates of any such deficits. Twenty left hemisphere stroke patients, ten of whom were apraxic, performed a task requiring identification of a named object in a visual display containing manipulation-related and unrelated distractor objects. Manipulation relationships among objects were not relevant to the identification task. Objects were cued with neutral ("S/he saw the…."), or action-relevant ("S/he used the….") sentences. Non-apraxic participants looked at use-related non-target objects significantly more than at unrelated non-target objects when cued both by neutral and action-relevant sentences, indicating that action information is incidentally activated. In contrast, apraxic participants showed delayed activation of manipulation-based action information during object identification when cued by neutral sentences. The magnitude of delayed activation in the neutral sentence condition was reliably predicted by lower scores on a test of gesture production to viewed objects, as well as by lesion loci in the inferior parietal and posterior temporal lobes. However, when cued by a sentence containing an action verb, apraxic participants showed fixation patterns that were statistically indistinguishable from non-apraxic controls. In support of grounded theories of cognition, these results suggest that apraxia and temporal-parietal lesions may be associated with abnormalities in incidental activation of action information from objects. Further, they suggest that the previously-observed facilitative role of action verbs in the retrieval of object-related action information extends to participants with apraxia.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apraxia; Eye tracking; Object use; Parietal; Temporal

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24746946      PMCID: PMC4096147          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  115 in total

1.  Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.

Authors:  Marco Tettamanti; Giovanni Buccino; Maria Cristina Saccuman; Vittorio Gallese; Massimo Danna; Paola Scifo; Ferruccio Fazio; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Stefano F Cappa; Daniela Perani
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Apraxia in neurorehabilitation: Classification, assessment and treatment.

Authors:  Tim Vanbellingen; Stephan Bohlhalter
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.138

3.  Action concepts in the brain: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Eileen R Cardillo; Geena R Ianni; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Leter: Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man.

Authors:  E Poppel; R Held; D Frost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Consuelo B Boronat; Laurel J Buxbaum; H Branch Coslett; Kathy Tang; Eleanor M Saffran; Daniel Y Kimberg; John A Detre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-07

7.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage.

Authors:  A Sirigu; J R Duhamel; L Cohen; B Pillon; B Dubois; Y Agid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-09-13       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use.

Authors:  Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Will Spijkers; Yong Li; Joachim Hermsdörfer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Response interference between functional and structural object-related actions is increased in patients with ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Neuropsychol       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 2.864

View more
  15 in total

1.  Impact of action primes on implicit processing of thematic and functional similarity relations: evidence from eye-tracking.

Authors:  Ewa Pluciennicka; Yannick Wamain; Yann Coello; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-16

2.  Reply: apraxia: a gestural or a cognitive disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Reduced competition between tool action neighbors in left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Frank E Garcea; Harrison Stoll; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Uncovering the architecture of action semantics.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Tracking sentence comprehension: Test-retest reliability in people with aphasia and unimpaired adults.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; Andrew Zu-Sern Wei; Stephanie Gutierrez; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.710

8.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on Osiurak and Badets (2016).

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Heidi Stieglitz Ham
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.