Literature DB >> 24909603

Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort.

Stefanie E Kuchinsky1, Jayne B Ahlstrom, Stephanie L Cute, Larry E Humes, Judy R Dubno, Mark A Eckert.   

Abstract

The current pupillometry study examined the impact of speech-perception training on word recognition and cognitive effort in older adults with hearing loss. Trainees identified more words at the follow-up than at the baseline session. Training also resulted in an overall larger and faster peaking pupillary response, even when controlling for performance and reaction time. Perceptual and cognitive capacities affected the peak amplitude of the pupil response across participants but did not diminish the impact of training on the other pupil metrics. Thus, we demonstrated that pupillometry can be used to characterize training-related and individual differences in effort during a challenging listening task. Importantly, the results indicate that speech-perception training not only affects overall word recognition, but also a physiological metric of cognitive effort, which has the potential to be a biomarker of hearing loss intervention outcome.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age-related hearing loss; Growth curve analysis; Pupillometry; Speech-perception training

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24909603      PMCID: PMC4234634          DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  78 in total

1.  Time's arrow and pupillary response.

Authors:  Antje Nuthmann; Elke van der Meer
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Speech understanding in quiet and noise, with and without hearing aids.

Authors:  Mathias Hällgren; Birgitta Larsby; Björn Lyxell; Stig Arlinger
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 3.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.

Authors:  Sarah Fraser; Jean-Pierre Gagné; Majolaine Alepins; Pascale Dubois
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Pupillary dilation as an index of task demands.

Authors:  Raúl Cabestrero; Antonio Crespo; Pilar Quirós
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2009-12

7.  Competing speech perception in older and younger adults: behavioral and eye-movement evidence.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Adrian Staub
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences.

Authors:  W S Peavler
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task.

Authors:  B Tursky; D Shapiro; A Crider; D Kahneman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-01

10.  How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  33 in total

1.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Physiological regulation and social-emotional processing in female carriers of the FMR1 premutation.

Authors:  Molly Winston; Kritika Nayar; Abigail L Hogan; Jamie Barstein; Chelsea La Valle; Kevin Sharp; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Molly Losh
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-11-22

3.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 4.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The Effects of Meaning-Based Auditory Training on Behavioral Measures of Perceptual Effort in Individuals with Impaired Hearing.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers; Nancy Tye-Murray; Joe Barcroft; Brent P Spehar
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

6.  How Does Auditory Training Work? Joined-Up Thinking and Listening.

Authors:  Melanie Ferguson; Helen Henshaw
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-11

7.  Effects of auditory training on low-pass filtered speech perception and listening-related cognitive load.

Authors:  Matthew G Wisniewski; Alexandria C Zakrzewski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.

Authors:  Kristin J Van Engen; Drew J McLaughlin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Stephanie L Cute; Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Mark A Eckert
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Eye-Tracking Evidence that Happy Faces Impair Verbal Message Comprehension: The Case of Health Warnings in Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical Television Commercials.

Authors:  Cristel Antonia Russell; John L Swasy; Dale Wesley Russell; Larry Engel
Journal:  Int J Advert       Date:  2016-07-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.