Literature DB >> 22390294

Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and function-based action features during object identification.

Chia-lin Lee1, Erica Middleton, Daniel Mirman, Solène Kalénine, Laurel J Buxbaum.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that action representations are activated during object processing, even when task-irrelevant. In addition, there is evidence that lexical-semantic context may affect such activation during object processing. Finally, prior work from our laboratory and others indicates that function-based ("use") and structure-based ("move") action subtypes may differ in their activation characteristics. Most studies assessing such effects, however, have required manual object-relevant motor responses, thereby plausibly influencing the activation of action representations. The present work uses eyetracking and a Visual World Paradigm task without object-relevant actions to assess the time course of activation of action representations, as well as their responsiveness to lexical-semantic context. In two experiments, participants heard a target word and selected its referent from an array of four objects. Gaze fixations on nontarget objects signal activation of features shared between targets and nontargets. The experiments assessed activation of structure-based (Experiment 1) or function-based (Experiment 2) distractors, using neutral sentences ("S/he saw the....") or sentences with a relevant action verb (Experiment 1: "S/he picked up the...."; Experiment 2: "S/he used the...."). We observed task-irrelevant activations of action information in both experiments. In neutral contexts, structure-based activation was relatively faster-rising but more transient than function-based activation. Additionally, action verb contexts reliably modified patterns of activation in both Experiments. These data provide fine-grained information about the dynamics of activation of function-based and structure-based actions in neutral and action-relevant contexts, in support of the "Two Action System" model of object and action processing (e.g., Buxbaum & Kalénine, 2010). PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22390294      PMCID: PMC3371276          DOI: 10.1037/a0027533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  61 in total

1.  Can actions affect perceptual processing?

Authors:  J Müsseler; S Steininger; P Wühr
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-02

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Visual search is modulated by action intentions.

Authors:  Harold Bekkering; Sebastiaan F W Neggers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2002-07

4.  Selective gating of visual signals by microstimulation of frontal cortex.

Authors:  Tirin Moore; Katherine M Armstrong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions.

Authors:  Giacomo Rizzolatti; Massimo Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Grounding language in action.

Authors:  Arthur M Glenberg; Michael P Kaschak
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

7.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect.

Authors:  L Craighero; L Fadiga; G Rizzolatti; C Umiltà
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures.

Authors:  Laila Craighero; Arianna Bello; Luciano Fadiga; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 9.  Ideomotor apraxia: a call to action.

Authors:  L J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 0.881

10.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  27 in total

1.  Observing functional actions affects semantic processing of tools: evidence of a motor-to-semantic priming.

Authors:  Francesco De Bellis; Antonia Ferrara; Domenico Errico; Francesco Panico; Laura Sagliano; Massimiliano Conson; Luigi Trojano
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Impact of action primes on implicit processing of thematic and functional similarity relations: evidence from eye-tracking.

Authors:  Ewa Pluciennicka; Yannick Wamain; Yann Coello; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-06-16

3.  How do you hold your mouse? Tracking the compatibility effect between hand posture and stimulus size.

Authors:  Andrea Flumini; Laura Barca; Anna M Borghi; Giovanni Pezzulo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.

Authors:  Solène Kalénine; Daniel Mirman; Erica L Middleton; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Two action systems in the human brain.

Authors:  Ferdinand Binkofski; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Reply: apraxia: a gestural or a cognitive disorder?

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Critical brain regions for tool-related and imitative actions: a componential analysis.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Allison D Shapiro; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Moving the gesture engram into the 21st century.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics.

Authors:  Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.