Literature DB >> 28333494

Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.

Daniel Mirman1, Jon-Frederick Landrigan2, Allison E Britt2.   

Abstract

Object concepts are critical for nearly all aspects of human cognition, from perception tasks like object recognition, to understanding and producing language, to making meaningful actions. Concepts can have 2 very different kinds of relations: similarity relations based on shared features (e.g., dog-bear), which are called "taxonomic" relations, and contiguity relations based on co-occurrence in events or scenarios (e.g., dog-leash), which are called "thematic" relations. Here, we report a systematic review of experimental psychology and cognitive neuroscience evidence of this distinction in the structure of semantic memory. We propose 2 principles that may drive the development of distinct taxonomic and thematic semantic systems: differences between which features determine taxonomic versus thematic relations, and differences in the processing required to extract taxonomic versus thematic relations. This review brings together distinct threads of behavioral, computational, and neuroscience research on semantic memory in support of a functional and neural dissociation, and defines a framework for future studies of semantic memory. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333494      PMCID: PMC5393928          DOI: 10.1037/bul0000092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  174 in total

1.  Objects and their actions: evidence for a neurally distributed semantic system.

Authors:  L K Tyler; E A Stamatakis; E Dick; P Bright; P Fletcher; H Moss
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns).

Authors:  George S Cree; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

3.  Categorical and associative relations increase false memory relative to purely associative relations.

Authors:  Jennifer H Coane; Dawn M McBride; Miia-Liisa Termonen; J Cooper Cutting
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

4.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension.

Authors:  Jiang Xu; Stefan Kemeny; Grace Park; Carol Frattali; Allen Braun
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.

Authors:  Ken McRae; George S Cree; Mark S Seidenberg; Chris McNorgan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-11

6.  Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.

Authors:  Myrna F Schwartz; Daniel Y Kimberg; Grant M Walker; Adelyn Brecher; Olufunsho K Faseyitan; Gary S Dell; Daniel Mirman; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Categorization and reasoning among tree experts: do all roads lead to Rome?

Authors:  D L Medin; E B Lynch; J D Coley; S Atran
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  The role of the left anterior temporal lobe in language processing revisited: Evidence from an individual with ATL resection.

Authors:  Yanchao Bi; Tao Wei; Chenxing Wu; Zaizhu Han; Tao Jiang; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Eve Overton; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

10.  Dynamics of activation of semantically similar concepts during spoken word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10
View more
  31 in total

1.  Challenges in Studying Multidimensional Semantic Representations in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Colleen Mills-Finnerty
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The influence of semantic associations on sentence production in schizophrenia: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Maike Creyaufmüller; Stefan Heim; Ute Habel; Juliane Mühlhaus
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 5.270

3.  Thematic and other semantic relations central to abstract (and concrete) concepts.

Authors:  Melissa Troyer; Ken McRae
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-06-11

4.  Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs.

Authors:  Chia-Lin Lee; Hsu-Wen Huang; Kara D Federmeier; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  The neurocognitive basis of knowledge about object identity and events: dissociations reflect opposing effects of semantic coherence and control.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Hannah Thompson; Piers Cornelissen; Jonathan Smallwood
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Recognition-induced forgetting of schematically related pictures.

Authors:  Paul S Scotti; Laura Janakiefski; Ashleigh M Maxcey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

7.  Contrasting Semantic versus Inhibitory Processing in the Angular Gyrus: An fMRI Study.

Authors:  Gwyneth A Lewis; David Poeppel; Gregory L Murphy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics.

Authors:  Jon-Frederick Landrigan; Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

9.  Verb-argument integration in primary progressive aphasia: Real-time argument access and selection.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mack; M-Marsel Mesulam; Emily J Rogalski; Cynthia K Thompson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Doctor, Teacher, and Stethoscope: Neural Representation of Different Types of Semantic Relations.

Authors:  Yangwen Xu; Xiaosha Wang; Xiaoying Wang; Weiwei Men; Jia-Hong Gao; Yanchao Bi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.