Literature DB >> 34326707

Use of a Qualitative Story Deck to Create Scenarios and Uncover Factors Associated with African American Participation in Genomics Research.

Susan R Passmore1, Amelia M Jamison2, Moaz Abdelwadoud3, Taylor B Rogers4, Morgan Wiggan2, Daniel C Mullins3, Stephen B Thomas2.   

Abstract

To gain a complex understanding of willingness to participate in genomics research among African Americans, we developed a technique specifically suited to studying decision making in a relaxed social setting. The "Qualitative Story Deck," (QSD) is a gamified, structured elicitation technique that allows for the spontaneous creation of scenarios with variable attributes. We used the QSD to create research scenarios that varied on four details (race/ethnicity of the researcher; research goal; biospecimen requested; and institutional affiliation). Participants created scenarios by randomly choosing cards from these categories and provided: (1) a judgement about their willingness to participate in the research project represented; and (2) their thought process in reaching a decision. The QSD has applicability to topics involving decision making or in cases where it would be beneficial to provide vignettes with alternate attributes. Additional benefits include: rapid establishment of rapport and engagement and the facilitation of discussion of little known or sensitive topics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African Americans; decision making; methodology; qualitative; research engagement; vignettes

Year:  2020        PMID: 34326707      PMCID: PMC8318208          DOI: 10.1177/1525822x20982089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Field methods        ISSN: 1525-822X


  19 in total

Review 1.  Classification and regression tree analysis in public health: methodological review and comparison with logistic regression.

Authors:  Stephenie C Lemon; Jason Roy; Melissa A Clark; Peter D Friedmann; William Rakowski
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

2.  Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.

Authors:  Colin Me Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2012-03-28

3.  Facilitating Interviews in Qualitative Research With Visual Tools: A Typology.

Authors:  Stephanie M N Glegg
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2018-07-10

4.  When will clinical trials finally reflect diversity?

Authors:  Todd C Knepper; Howard L McLeod
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Public and biobank participant attitudes toward genetic research participation and data sharing.

Authors:  A A Lemke; W A Wolf; J Hebert-Beirne; M E Smith
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Social Desirability Response Bias and Other Factors That May Influence Self-Reports of Substance Use and HIV Risk Behaviors: A Qualitative Study of Drug Users in Vietnam.

Authors:  Carl A Latkin; Nguyen Vu Tuyet Mai; Tran Viet Ha; Teerada Sripaipan; Carla Zelaya; Nguyen Le Minh; Giuliana Morales; Vivian F Go
Journal:  AIDS Educ Prev       Date:  2016-10

7.  The Symbolic Value and Limitations of Racial Concordance in Minority Research Engagement.

Authors:  Craig S Fryer; Susan R Passmore; Raymond C Maietta; Jeff Petruzzelli; Erica Casper; Natasha A Brown; James Butler; Mary A Garza; Stephen B Thomas; Sandra C Quinn
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-03-13

8.  The Tuskegee Syphilis Study, 1932 to 1972: implications for HIV education and AIDS risk education programs in the black community.

Authors:  S B Thomas; S C Quinn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  How to do a grounded theory study: a worked example of a study of dental practices.

Authors:  Alexandra Sbaraini; Stacy M Carter; R Wendell Evans; Anthony Blinkhorn
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.