Literature DB >> 6449530

Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.

M C Smith, L E Magee.   

Abstract

A number of independent lines of research have suggested that semantic and articulatory information become available differentially from pictures and words. The first of the experiments reported here sought to clarify the time course by which information about pictures and words becomes available by considering the pattern of interference generated when incongruent pictures and words are presented simultaneously in a Stroop-like situation. Previous investigators report that picture naming is easily disrupted by the presence of a distracting word but that word naming is relatively immune to interference from an incongruent picture. Under the assumption that information available from a completed process may disrupt an ongoing process, these results suggest that words access articulatory information more rapidly than do pictures. Experiment 1 extended this paradigm by requiring subjects to verify the category of the target stimulus. In accordance with the hypothesis that picture access the semantic code more rapidly than words, there was a reversal in the interference pattern: Word categorization suffered considerable disruption, whereas picture categorization was minimally affected by the presence of an incongruent word. Experiment 2 sought to further test the hypothesis that access to semantic and articulatory codes is different for pictures and words by examining memory for those items following naming or categorization. Categorized words were better recognized than named words, whereas the reverse was true for pictures, a result which suggests that picture naming involves more extensive processing than picture categorization. Experiment 3 replicated this result under conditions in which viewing time was held constant. The last experiment extended the investigation of memory differences to a situation in which subjects were required to generate the superordinate category name. Here, memory for categorized pictures was as good as memory for named pictures. Category generation also influenced memory for words, memory performance being superior to that following a yes--no verification of category membership. These experiments suggest a model of information access whereby pictures access semantic information were readily than name information, with the reverse being true for words. Memory for both pictures and words was a function of the amount of processing required to access a particular type of information as well as the extent of response differentiation necessitated by the task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6449530     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  55 in total

1.  Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  The locus and nature of semantic congruity in symbolic comparison: evidence from the Stroop effect.

Authors:  Samuel Shaki; Daniel Algom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Naming pictures at no cost: asymmetries in picture and word conditional naming.

Authors:  Remo Job; Elena Tenconi
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  Presentation format and its effect on working memory.

Authors:  Paula Goolkasian; Paul W Foos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

5.  Differences between digit naming and number word reading in a flanker task.

Authors:  Anja Ischebeck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-06

6.  Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words.

Authors:  Markus F Damian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-01

7.  The impact of task rules on distracter processing: automatic categorization of irrelevant stimuli.

Authors:  Renate Reisenauer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-01-18

8.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

9.  Presentation format effects in working memory: the role of attention.

Authors:  Paul W Foos; Paula Goolkasian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

10.  Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.

Authors:  Yoav Bar-Anan; Nira Liberman; Yaacov Trope; Daniel Algom
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.