Literature DB >> 6224889

The cost of visual filtering.

D Kahneman, A Treisman, J Burkell.   

Abstract

Speeded choice responses (reading or naming) to a relevant stimulus under conditions of spatial uncertainty are delayed by the simultaneous occurrence of other events. This "filtering cost" occurs despite high discriminability of target and distractors, which allows parallel detection of the target in search through the same displays. Reading is also delayed when the removal of irrelevant objects from the field coincides with the onset of the target. Filtering costs are caused by the processing of events rather than by the mere presence of irrelevant items. They are eliminated by advance information about the location of the target or by advance presentation of maintained distractors.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6224889     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.9.4.510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  42 in total

1.  Dissociating striatal and hippocampal function developmentally with a stimulus-response compatibility task.

Authors:  B J Casey; Kathleen M Thomas; Matthew C Davidson; Karen Kunz; Peter L Franzen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Evidence for early selection: precuing target location reduces interference from same-category distractors.

Authors:  L Paquet; C Lortie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-10

3.  Semantic processing of unattended text during selective reading: how the eyes see it.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; D Briihl
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-03

4.  Working memory and target-related distractor effects on visual search.

Authors:  Alex Bahrami Balani; David Soto; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

5.  Involuntary attentional capture by abrupt onsets.

Authors:  R W Remington; J C Johnston; S Yantis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-03

Review 6.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

7.  The impact of Degraded distractors on (Nondegraded) target identification.

Authors:  Ada Kritikos; Alexia Pavlis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effects of attentional load on early visual processing depend on stimulus timing.

Authors:  Karsten Rauss; Gilles Pourtois; Patrik Vuilleumier; Sophie Schwartz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Modulation of shifting receptive field activity in frontal eye field by visual salience.

Authors:  Wilsaan M Joiner; James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Behavioral and neural correlates of delay of gratification 40 years later.

Authors:  B J Casey; Leah H Somerville; Ian H Gotlib; Ozlem Ayduk; Nicholas T Franklin; Mary K Askren; John Jonides; Marc G Berman; Nicole L Wilson; Theresa Teslovich; Gary Glover; Vivian Zayas; Walter Mischel; Yuichi Shoda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.