Literature DB >> 22422010

Carbon dioxide (CO2) demand-controlled ventilation in university computer classrooms and possible effects on headache, fatigue and perceived indoor environment: an intervention study.

Dan Norbäck1, Klas Nordström, Zhuohui Zhao.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the effects of a CO(2) demand-controlled ventilation system (variable flow) in computer classrooms on perceived air quality and sick building syndrome.
METHODS: University students (27% women) participated in a blinded study. Two classrooms had variable flow (mean 5.56 ac/h); two others had constant ventilation flow (mean 5.07 ac/h). After one week, ventilation conditions were shifted. The students reported symptoms/perceptions during the last hour on rating scales. Temperature, air humidity, CO(2), PM10 and number concentration of particles were measured simultaneously. Cat (Fel d 1), dog (Can f 1), horse (Equ cx) and house dust mites (Der f 1 and Der p 1) allergens were measured in dust. Those participating twice in the same classroom (N = 61) were analysed longitudinally.
RESULTS: Mean CO(2) was 784 ppm (9% of time >1,000 ppm) with variable flow and 809 ppm with constant flow conditions (25% of time >1,000 ppm). Mean temperature (22.6 °C), PM10 (18 μg/m(3)) and number concentration (1,860 pt/cm(3)) were unchanged. The median levels of cat, dog, horse and Der f 1 allergens were 10,400 ng/g, 4,900 ng/g, 13,700 U/ng and 260 ng/g dust, respectively. There were slightly less headache (p = 0.003), tiredness (p = 0.007) and improved perceived air quality (p = 0.02) with variable flow.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a CO(2)-controlled ventilation system, reducing elevated levels of CO(2), may slightly reduce headache and tiredness and improve perceived air quality. The high levels of pet allergens, due to track in of allergens from the home and possible accumulation due to electrostatic forces, illustrate a need for improved cleaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22422010     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-012-0756-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  24 in total

1.  New ventilation systems at select schools in Sweden--effects on asthma and exposure.

Authors:  G Smedje; D Norbäck
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

2.  Perception of cockpit environment among pilots on commercial aircraft.

Authors:  Torsten Lindgren; Kjell Andersson; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2006-08

3.  Changes in ocular and nasal signs and symptoms among air crew in relation to air humidification on intercontinental flights.

Authors:  Dan Norbäck; Torsten Lindgren; Gunilla Wieslander
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Effect of air humidification on the sick building syndrome and perceived indoor air quality in hospitals: a four month longitudinal study.

Authors:  K Nordström; D Norbäck; R Akselsson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 5.  Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature.

Authors:  M J Mendell; G A Heath
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.770

6.  Worsening of asthma in children allergic to cats, after indirect exposure to cat at school.

Authors:  C Almqvist; M Wickman; L Perfetti; N Berglind; A Renström; M Hedrén; K Larsson; G Hedlin; P Malmberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 21.405

7.  Sick building syndrome and perceived indoor environment in relation to energy saving by reduced ventilation flow during heating season: a 1 year intervention study in dwellings.

Authors:  K Engvall; P Wickman; D Norbäck
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.770

8.  An experimental study on effects of increased ventilation flow on students' perception of indoor environment in computer classrooms.

Authors:  D Norbäck; K Nordström
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 5.770

9.  School air quality related to dry cough, rhinitis and nasal patency in children.

Authors:  M Simoni; I Annesi-Maesano; T Sigsgaard; D Norback; G Wieslander; W Nystad; M Canciani; P Sestini; G Viegi
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 16.671

10.  Sick building syndrome in relation to air exchange rate, CO(2), room temperature and relative air humidity in university computer classrooms: an experimental study.

Authors:  Dan Norbäck; Klas Nordström
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.015

View more
  5 in total

1.  Human symptom responses to bioeffluents, short-chain carbonyls/acids, and long-chain carbonyls in a simulated aircraft cabin environment.

Authors:  C P Weisel; N Fiedler; C J Weschler; P A Ohman-Strickland; K R Mohan; K McNeil; D R Space
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.770

2.  Characterization of Indoor Air Quality on a College Campus: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Grant Erlandson; Sheryl Magzamen; Ellison Carter; Julia L Sharp; Stephen J Reynolds; Joshua W Schaeffer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Combined effects of ventilation rates and indoor temperatures on cognitive performance of female higher education students in a hot climate.

Authors:  Riham Ahmed; Dejan Mumovic; Emmanouil Bagkeris; Marcella Ucci
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 6.554

4.  Indoor air quality in Brazilian universities.

Authors:  Sonia R Jurado; Antônia D P Bankoff; Andrea Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Poor housing conditions in association with child health in a disadvantaged immigrant population: a cross-sectional study in Rosengård, Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  Anna Oudin; Jens C Richter; Tahir Taj; Lina Al-Nahar; Kristina Jakobsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.