Literature DB >> 18422569

An experimental study on effects of increased ventilation flow on students' perception of indoor environment in computer classrooms.

D Norbäck1, K Nordström.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The effects of ventilation in computer classrooms were studied with university students (n = 355) in a blinded study, 31% were women and 3.8% had asthma. Two classrooms had a higher air exchange (4.1-5.2 ac/h); two others had a lower air exchange (2.3-2.6 ac/h). After 1 week, ventilation conditions were shifted. The students reported environmental perceptions during the last hour. Room temperature, RH, CO2, PM10 and ultra-fine particles were measured simultaneously. Mean CO2 was 1185 ppm at lower and 922 ppm at higher air exchange. Mean temperature was 23.2 degrees C at lower and 22.1 degrees C at higher air exchange. After mutual adjustment (temperature, RH, CO2, air exchange), measured temperature was associated with a perception of higher temperature (P < 0.001), lower air movement (P < 0.001), and poorer air quality (P < 0.001). Higher air exchange was associated with a perception of lower temperature (P < 0.001), higher air movement (P = 0.001), and better air quality (P < 0.001). In the longitudinal analysis (n = 83), increased air exchange caused a perception of lower temperature (P = 0.002), higher air movement (P < 0.001), better air quality (P = 0.001), and less odor (P = 0.02). In conclusion, computer classrooms have CO2 levels above 1000 ppm and temperatures above 22 degrees C. Increased ventilation from 7 l/s per person to 10-13 l/s per person can improve thermal comfort and air quality. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Computer classrooms are crowded indoor environments with a high thermal load from both students and computer equipment. It is important to control room temperature either by air conditioning, sun shields, or sufficiently high ventilation flow. A high ventilation flow is also crucial to achieving good perceived air quality. Personal ventilation flow should be at least 10 l/s. Possible loss of learning ability due to poor indoor air quality in university buildings deserves more attention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18422569     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2008.00530.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  6 in total

1.  Carbon dioxide (CO2) demand-controlled ventilation in university computer classrooms and possible effects on headache, fatigue and perceived indoor environment: an intervention study.

Authors:  Dan Norbäck; Klas Nordström; Zhuohui Zhao
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Sick building syndrome (SBS) and sick house syndrome (SHS) in relation to psychosocial stress at work in the Swedish workforce.

Authors:  Roma Runeson-Broberg; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Rhinitis, asthma and respiratory infections among adults in relation to the home environment in multi-family buildings in Sweden.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Karin Engvall; Greta Smedje; Dan Norbäck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A longitudinal study of sick building syndrome (SBS) among pupils in relation to SO2, NO2, O3 and PM10 in schools in China.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Fan Li; Li Zhang; Zhuohui Zhao; Dan Norback
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Understanding teachers' experiences of ventilation in California K-12 classrooms and implications for supporting safe operation of schools in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Angela Sanguinetti; Sarah Outcault; Theresa Pistochini; Madison Hoffacker
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.554

6.  Association between Four-Level Categorisation of Indoor Exposure and Perceived Indoor Air Quality.

Authors:  Katja Tähtinen; Sanna Lappalainen; Kirsi Karvala; Jouko Remes; Heidi Salonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.