Literature DB >> 15660567

Do indoor pollutants and thermal conditions in schools influence student performance? A critical review of the literature.

M J Mendell1, G A Heath.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To assess whether school environments can adversely affect academic performance, we review scientific evidence relating indoor pollutants and thermal conditions, in schools or other indoor environments, to human performance or attendance. We critically review evidence for direct associations between these aspects of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) and performance or attendance. Secondarily, we summarize, without critique, evidence on indirect connections potentially linking IEQ to performance or attendance. Regarding direct associations, little strongly designed research was available. Persuasive evidence links higher indoor concentrations of NO(2) to reduced school attendance, and suggestive evidence links low ventilation rates to reduced performance. Regarding indirect associations, many studies link indoor dampness and microbiologic pollutants (primarily in homes) to asthma exacerbations and respiratory infections, which in turn have been related to reduced performance and attendance. Also, much evidence links poor IEQ (e.g. low ventilation rate, excess moisture, or formaldehyde) with adverse health effects in children and adults and documents dampness problems and inadequate ventilation as common in schools. Overall, evidence suggests that poor IEQ in schools is common and adversely influences the performance and attendance of students, primarily through health effects from indoor pollutants. Evidence is available to justify (i) immediate actions to assess and improve IEQ in schools and (ii) focused research to guide IEQ improvements in schools. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: There is more justification now for improving IEQ in schools to reduce health risks to students than to reduce performance or attendance risks. However, as IEQ-performance links are likely to operate largely through effects of IEQ on health, IEQ improvements that benefit the health of students are likely to have performance and attendance benefits as well. Immediate actions are warranted in schools to prevent dampness problems, inadequate ventilation, and excess indoor exposures to substances such as NO(2) and formaldehyde. Also, siting of new schools in areas with lower outdoor pollutant levels is preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15660567     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00320.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indoor Air        ISSN: 0905-6947            Impact factor:   5.770


  62 in total

1.  Indoor air quality differences between urban and rural preschools in Korea.

Authors:  Chungsik Yoon; Kiyoung Lee; Donguk Park
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The impact of school building conditions on student absenteeism in Upstate New York.

Authors:  Elinor Simons; Syni-An Hwang; Edward F Fitzgerald; Christine Kielb; Shao Lin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Indoor air quality modeling for PM 10, PM 2.5, and PM 1.0 in naturally ventilated classrooms of an urban Indian school building.

Authors:  Radha Goyal; Mukesh Khare
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  A holistic approach for the assessment of the indoor environmental quality, student productivity, and energy consumption in primary schools.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vivian Dorizas; Margarita-Niki Assimakopoulos; Mattheos Santamouris
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  School Environmental Intervention Programs.

Authors:  Perdita Permaul; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract       Date:  2018 Jan - Feb

6.  Building and indoor environmental quality assessment of Nigerian primary schools: A pilot study.

Authors:  Oluyemi Toyinbo; Wanda Phipatanakul; Richard Shaughnessy; Ulla Haverinen-Shaughnessy
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 7.  School exposure and asthma.

Authors:  Brittany Esty; Wanda Phipatanakul
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 6.347

8.  The influence of individual and contextual psychosocial work factors on the perception of the indoor environment at work: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Brauer; Sigurd Mikkelsen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Evaluation of microbiological air quality and of microclimate in university classrooms.

Authors:  Pietro Grisoli; Marinella Rodolfi; Tiziana Chiara; Laura Attinia Zonta; Cesare Dacarro
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.513

10.  Formaldehyde Levels in Traditional and Portable Classrooms: A Pilot Investigation.

Authors:  Isabela C Ribeiro; Peter J Kowalski; David B Callahan; Gary P Noonan; Daphne B Moffett; David R Olson; Josephine Malilay
Journal:  J Environ Health       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.