OBJECTIVE: To model the uptake phase of T(1)-weighted DCE-MRI data in normal kidneys and to demonstrate that the fitted physiological parameters correlate with published normal values. METHODS: The model incorporates delay and broadening of the arterial vascular peak as it appears in the capillary bed, two distinct compartments for renal intravascular and extravascular Gd tracer, and uses a small-vessel haematocrit value of 24%. Four physiological parameters can be estimated: regional filtration K ( trans ) (ml min(-1) [ml tissue](-1)), perfusion F (ml min(-1) [100 ml tissue](-1)), blood volume v ( b ) (%) and mean residence time MRT (s). From these are found the filtration fraction (FF; %) and total GFR (ml min(-1)). Fifteen healthy volunteers were imaged twice using oblique coronal slices every 2.5 s to determine the reproducibility. RESULTS: Using parenchymal ROIs, group mean values for renal biomarkers all agreed with published values: K ( trans ): 0.25; F: 219; v ( b ): 34; MRT: 5.5; FF: 15; GFR: 115. Nominally cortical ROIs consistently underestimated total filtration (by ~50%). Reproducibility was 7-18%. Sensitivity analysis showed that these fitted parameters are most vulnerable to errors in the fixed parameters kidney T(1), flip angle, haematocrit and relaxivity. CONCLUSIONS: These renal biomarkers can potentially measure renal physiology in diagnosis and treatment. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can measure renal function. • Filtration and perfusion values in healthy volunteers agree with published normal values. • Precision measured in healthy volunteers is between 7 and 15%.
OBJECTIVE: To model the uptake phase of T(1)-weighted DCE-MRI data in normal kidneys and to demonstrate that the fitted physiological parameters correlate with published normal values. METHODS: The model incorporates delay and broadening of the arterial vascular peak as it appears in the capillary bed, two distinct compartments for renal intravascular and extravascular Gd tracer, and uses a small-vessel haematocrit value of 24%. Four physiological parameters can be estimated: regional filtration K ( trans ) (ml min(-1) [ml tissue](-1)), perfusion F (ml min(-1) [100 ml tissue](-1)), blood volume v ( b ) (%) and mean residence time MRT (s). From these are found the filtration fraction (FF; %) and total GFR (ml min(-1)). Fifteen healthy volunteers were imaged twice using oblique coronal slices every 2.5 s to determine the reproducibility. RESULTS: Using parenchymal ROIs, group mean values for renal biomarkers all agreed with published values: K ( trans ): 0.25; F: 219; v ( b ): 34; MRT: 5.5; FF: 15; GFR: 115. Nominally cortical ROIs consistently underestimated total filtration (by ~50%). Reproducibility was 7-18%. Sensitivity analysis showed that these fitted parameters are most vulnerable to errors in the fixed parameters kidney T(1), flip angle, haematocrit and relaxivity. CONCLUSIONS: These renal biomarkers can potentially measure renal physiology in diagnosis and treatment. KEY POINTS: • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can measure renal function. • Filtration and perfusion values in healthy volunteers agree with published normal values. • Precision measured in healthy volunteers is between 7 and 15%.
Authors: A Prigent; P Cosgriff; G F Gates; G Granerus; E J Fine; K Itoh; M Peters; A Piepsz; M Rehling; M Rutland; A Taylor Journal: Semin Nucl Med Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 4.446
Authors: Henrik J Michaely; Steven Sourbron; Olaf Dietrich; Ulrike Attenberger; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2006-12-07
Authors: D Rodriguez Gutierrez; K Wells; O Diaz Montesdeoca; A Moran Santana; I A Mendichovszky; I Gordon Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Andreas Helck; Wieland H Sommer; Ernst Klotz; Matthias Wessely; Steven Pieter Sourbron; Konstantin Nikolaou; Dirk A Clevert; Mike Notohamiprodjo; Wolf D Illner; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Christoph Becker Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Sila Kurugol; Onur Afacan; Richard S Lee; Catherine M Seager; Michael A Ferguson; Deborah R Stein; Reid C Nichols; Monet Dugan; Alto Stemmer; Simon K Warfield; Jeanne S Chow Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2020-01-27
Authors: Marica Cutajar; David L Thomas; Patrick W Hales; T Banks; Christopher A Clark; Isky Gordon Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Umit Yoruk; Manojkumar Saranathan; Andreas M Loening; Brian A Hargreaves; Shreyas S Vasanawala Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jeff L Zhang; Chris C Conlin; Kristi Carlston; Luke Xie; Daniel Kim; Glen Morrell; Kathryn Morton; Vivian S Lee Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Marica Cutajar; Rachel Hilton; Jonathon Olsburgh; Stephen D Marks; David L Thomas; Tina Banks; Christopher A Clark; Isky Gordon Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-02-11 Impact factor: 5.315