Literature DB >> 22407970

Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Richard Kijowski1, Michael Tuite, Diane Kruger, Alejandro Munoz Del Rio, Michael Kleerekoper, Neil Binkley.   

Abstract

This study compared microscopic magnetic resonance imaging (µMRI) parameters of trabecular microarchitecture between postmenopausal women with and without fracture who have normal or osteopenic bone mineral density (BMD) on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). It included 36 postmenopausal white women 50 years of age and older with normal or osteopenic BMD (T-scores better than -2.5 at the lumbar spine, proximal femur, and one-third radius on DXA). Eighteen women had a history of low-energy fracture, whereas 18 women had no history of fracture and served as an age, race, and ultradistal radius BMD-matched control group. A three-dimensional fast large-angle spin-echo (FLASE) sequence with 137 µm × 137 µm × 400 µm resolution was performed through the nondominant wrist of all 36 women using the same 1.5T scanner. The high-resolution images were used to measure trabecular bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, surface-to-curve ratio, and erosion index. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare differences in BMD and µMRI parameters between postmenopausal women with and without fracture. Post-menopausal women with fracture had significantly lower (p < 0.05) trabecular bone volume fraction and surface-to-curve ratio and significantly higher (p < 0.05) erosion index than postmenopausal women without fracture. There was no significant difference between postmenopausal women with and without fracture in trabecular thickness (p = 0.80) and BMD of the spine (p = 0.21), proximal femur (p = 0.19), one-third radius (p = 0.47), and ultradistal radius (p = 0.90). Postmenopausal women with normal or osteopenic BMD who had a history of low-energy fracture had significantly different (p < 0.05) µMRI parameters than an age, race, and ultradistal radius BMD-matched control group of postmenopausal women with no history of fracture. Our study suggests that µMRI can be used to identify individuals without a DXA-based diagnosis of osteoporosis who have impaired trabecular microarchitecture and thus a heretofore-unappreciated elevated fracture risk.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22407970      PMCID: PMC3377771          DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.1595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  58 in total

1.  Trabecular bone architecture in the distal radius using magnetic resonance imaging in subjects with fractures of the proximal femur. Magnetic Resonance Science Center and Osteoporosis and Arthritis Research Group.

Authors:  S Majumdar; T M Link; P Augat; J C Lin; D Newitt; N E Lane; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Direct measures of trabecular bone architecture from MR images.

Authors:  A Laib; O Beuf; A Issever; D C Newitt; S Majumdar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Topological analysis of trabecular bone MR images.

Authors:  B R Gomberg; P K Saha; H K Song; S N Hwang; F W Wehrli
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis.

Authors:  F W Wehrli; B R Gomberg; P K Saha; H K Song; S N Hwang; P J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: II. Three-dimensional histology.

Authors:  J E Aaron; P A Shore; R C Shore; M Beneton; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  R M Neer; C D Arnaud; J R Zanchetta; R Prince; G A Gaich; J Y Reginster; A B Hodsman; E F Eriksen; S Ish-Shalom; H K Genant; O Wang; B H Mitlak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss.

Authors:  Y Duan; C H Turner; B T Kim; E Seeman
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes.

Authors:  D T Gold
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.670

10.  In vivo comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance image analysis of the distal radius in the assessment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B Cortet; N Boutry; P Dubois; P Bourel; A Cotten; X Marchandise
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  10 in total

1.  The influence of the genetic and non-genetic factors on bone mineral density and osteoporotic fractures in Chinese women.

Authors:  Yan-Hua Deng; Lin Zhao; Min-Jia Zhang; Chun-Ming Pan; Shuang-Xia Zhao; Hong-Yan Zhao; Li-Hao Sun; Bei Tao; Huai-Dong Song; Wei-Qing Wang; Guang Ning; Jian-Min Liu
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 2.  MRI assessment of bone structure and microarchitecture.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Sean Boone; Dimitri Martel; Chamith S Rajapakse; Robert S Hallyburton; Mitch Valko; Stephen Honig; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  3-T MR Imaging of Proximal Femur Microarchitecture in Subjects with and without Fragility Fracture and Nonosteoporotic Proximal Femur Bone Mineral Density.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Chamith S Rajapakse; Cheng Chen; Arakua Welbeck; Kenneth Egol; Ravinder R Regatte; Punam K Saha; Stephen Honig
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Bone Mineral Density as a Predictor of Subsequent Wrist Fractures: Findings From the Women's Health Initiative Study.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall; Kathleen M Hovey; Christopher A Andrews; Jane A Cauley; JoAnn E Manson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nicole C Wright; Wenjun Li; Kristen Beavers; Jeffrey R Curtis; Meryl S LeBoff
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Changes in Nonosteoporotic Bone Density and Subsequent Fractures in Women.

Authors:  Alfred K Pfister; Christine A Welch; Molly John; Mary K Emmett
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 0.954

6.  Statins and hip fracture prevention--a population based cohort study in women.

Authors:  Arja Helin-Salmivaara; Maarit J Korhonen; Petri Lehenkari; Seppo Y T Junnila; Pertti J Neuvonen; Päivi Ruokoniemi; Risto Huupponen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: Modern Paradigms for Last Century's Bones.

Authors:  Marlena C Kruger; Frances M Wolber
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Assessment of Fat distribution and Bone quality with Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) in Healthy Chinese Men.

Authors:  Shan Lv; Aisen Zhang; Wenjuan Di; Yunlu Sheng; Peng Cheng; Hanmei Qi; Juan Liu; Jing Yu; Guoxian Ding; Jinmei Cai; Bin Lai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Correlation between Trabecular Bone Score and Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Normal and High Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Alireza Rajaei; Ali Amiri; Faraneh Farsad; Pooneh Dehghan
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2019-09

10.  Physiologic osteoclasts are not sufficient to induce skeletal pain in mice.

Authors:  Larissa de Clauser; Sonia Santana-Varela; John N Wood; Shafaq Sikandar
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.931

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.