Literature DB >> 11760841

Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than bone loss.

Y Duan1, C H Turner, B T Kim, E Seeman.   

Abstract

Spine fractures usually occur less commonly in men than in women. To identify the structural basis for this gender difference in vertebral fragility, we studied 1013 healthy subjects (327 men and 686 women) and 76 patients with spine fractures (26 men and 50 women). Bone mineral content (BMC), cross-sectional area (CSA), and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the third lumbar vertebral body (L3) were measured by posteroanterior (PA) and lateral scanning using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In this cross-sectional study, the diminution in peak vertebral body BMC from young adulthood to old age was less in men than in women (6% vs. 27%). This diminution was the net result of two opposing changes occurring concurrently throughout adult life: the removal of bone adjacent to marrow on the inner (endosteal) surface by bone resorption and the deposition of bone on the outer (periosteal) surface by bone formation. For L3, we estimated that men resorbed 3.7 g and deposited 3.1 g, producing a net loss of 0.6 g from young adulthood to old age and women resorbed 3.1 g and deposited only 1.2 g, producing a net loss of 1.9 g. Thus, based on our indirect estimates of periosteal gain and endosteal loss across life, the observed net diminution in BMC during aging was less in men than women because absolute periosteal bone formation was greater in men than women (3.1 g vs. 1.2 g) not because absolute bone resorption was less in men. On the contrary, the absolute amount of bone resorbed was greater in men than women (3.7 g vs. 3.1 g). Periosteal bone formation also increased vertebral body CSA 3-fold more in men than in women, distributing loads onto a larger CSA, so that the load imposed per unit CSA decreased twice as much in men than in women (13% vs. 5%). In men and women with spine fractures, CSA and vBMD were reduced relative to age-matched controls. However, vBMD was no different to the adjusted vBMD in age-matched controls derived assuming controls had no periosteal bone formation during aging. Thus, large amounts of bone are resorbed in men as well as in women, accounting for the age-related increase in spine fractures in both genders. Periosteal bone formation increases CSA and offsets bone loss in both genders but more greatly in men, accounting for the lower incidence of spine fractures in men than in women. We speculate that reduced periosteal bone formation, during growth or aging, may be in part responsible for both reduced vertebral size and reduced vBMD in men and women with spine fractures. Sexual dimorphism in vertebral fragility is more the result of gender differences in age-related bone gain than age-related bone loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11760841     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.12.2267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  50 in total

1.  Modeling the benefits of pamidronate in children with osteogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Robert Lindsay
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Bone quality.

Authors:  Ego Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Bone microarchitecture and strength.

Authors:  David W Dempster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Noncontact ultrasound imaging applied to cortical bone phantoms.

Authors:  J B Bulman; K S Ganezer; P W Halcrow; Ian Neeson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Mechanical loading during growth is associated with plane-specific differences in vertebral geometry: A cross-sectional analysis comparing artistic gymnasts vs. non-gymnasts.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Paula F Rosenbaum; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 7.  Bone geometry and skeletal fragility.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; David Karasik
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  The amount of periosteal apposition required to maintain bone strength during aging depends on adult bone morphology and tissue-modulus degradation rate.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Interindividual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during postnatal growth and predictable based on bone robustness.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Siddharth Bhola; Andrew Goldstone; Fred Chen; Jessica Chrzanowski; Carl J Terranova; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Functional and association analysis of frizzled 1 (FZD1) promoter haplotypes with femoral neck geometry.

Authors:  Yingze Zhang; Allison L Kuipers; Laura M Yerges-Armstrong; Cara S Nestlerode; Zhao Jin; Victor W Wheeler; Alan L Patrick; Clareann H Bunker; Joseph M Zmuda
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.