Literature DB >> 11285999

The nonskeletal consequences of osteoporotic fractures. Psychologic and social outcomes.

D T Gold1.   

Abstract

The prevalence of osteoporosis is rising as the population of the United States and other developed countries ages. These increasing numbers of people have motivated pharmaceutical companies to develop and market several antiresorptive medications that can slow down the bone loss associated with osteoporosis. Although these are not cures for this disease, they are an important first step in a vital ongoing public health effort to prevent osteoporosis in the future and to manage osteoporosis now. We cannot expect to remediate the problems caused by this disease if we attend only to its skeletal implications. Like any other chronic disease, osteoporosis has significant psychologic and social consequences. From anxiety and depression to social withdrawal and isolation, if these problems are left unresolved, they can have a significant negative impact not only on health issues but also on overall quality of life. No quick fixes exist for the numerous ways in which osteoporosis can transform an autonomous person into a dependent and hopeless patient. In part, responsibility for helping this patient rests with the medical community. Referrals to appropriate providers can improve a patient's physical and emotional well-being. Physician specialists can help the patient manage comorbid conditions. Physical and occupational therapists can teach exercises, home safety, and safe movement. Social workers can provide a framework for coping that enables individuals to improve their interpersonal interactions and minimize stress in their lives. Nutritionists, pharmacists, nurses, and other health care professionals can make major contributions to the quality of life of people with osteoporosis and should be encouraged to do so. Unfortunately, managed care has set policies that deprive patients with osteoporosis of the kinds of care that would be most useful to them. As we have advocated for the last 15 years, a multidisciplinary approach offers patients the most positive overall way to manage osteoporosis. Therefore, new alternatives need to be examined, alternatives that provide both low-cost and high-quality care. In the long run, patients who practice self-management, that is, those who take responsibility for their own calcium and vitamin D intake, are compliant with medications, exercise, and practice home safety, and who have a healthy outlook, can control their osteoporosis. The most effective intervention for the future may be to teach individuals how to use self-management strategies so that they can take charge of their osteoporosis and positively influence their quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11285999     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-857x(05)70197-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-857X            Impact factor:   2.670


  39 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Osteoporosis and depression: a historical perspective.

Authors:  Deborah T Gold; Samantha Solimeo
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Validation of the Malay version of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO-41) in Malaysia.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Nagammai; Mohamed Mohazmi; Su May Liew; Karuthan Chinna; Pauline Siew Mei Lai
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Morphometric vertebral fractures of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine, physical function and quality of life in men.

Authors:  J A Pasco; M J Henry; S Korn; G C Nicholson; M A Kotowicz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Community-based exercise program reduces risk factors for falls in 65- to 75-year-old women with osteoporosis: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nick D Carter; Karim M Khan; Heather A McKay; Moira A Petit; Constance Waterman; Ari Heinonen; Patti A Janssen; Meghan G Donaldson; Arthur Mallinson; Lenore Riddell; Karen Kruse; Jerilynn C Prior; Leon Flicker
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Predicting delayed union in osteoporotic vertebral fractures with consecutive magnetic resonance imaging in the acute phase: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  S Takahashi; M Hoshino; K Takayama; K Iseki; R Sasaoka; T Tsujio; H Yasuda; T Sasaki; F Kanematsu; H Kono; H Toyoda; H Nakamura
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-06-25       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; D Krueger; R Gangnon; H K Genant; M K Drezner
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  A striving for independence: a qualitative study of women living with vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Inger Hallberg; Anna-Christina Ek; Göran Toss; Margareta Bachrach-Lindström
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2010-04-16

9.  Psychological state, quality of life, and body composition in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in Lithuania.

Authors:  Lina Lasaite; Aurelija Krasauskiene
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Quality of life in ambulatory postmenopausal women: the impact of reduced bone mineral density and subclinical vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Elisabetta Romagnoli; Vincenzo Carnevale; Italo Nofroni; Emilio D'Erasmo; Federica Paglia; Simona De Geronimo; Jessica Pepe; Natalia Raejntroph; Marianna Maranghi; Salvatore Minisola
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.