Literature DB >> 10913922

Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: II. Three-dimensional histology.

J E Aaron1, P A Shore, R C Shore, M Beneton, J A Kanis.   

Abstract

We recently developed a simple and inexpensive method that complements established bone histomorphometry procedures by enabling the two-dimensional imaging of cancellous bone to be viewed within its three-dimensional context with the marrow tissue in place and without detriment to the material for other histological purposes. The method, based on the preparation and superficial staining of slices 300 microm thick, enables "real" (i.e., unstained) trabecular termini to be separated from "artifactual" (i.e., stained) termini, providing a direct measure of cancellous connectivity in osteopenic bone. The technique was applied to osteopenic age-matched, white, postmenopausal women (31 with and 22 without vertebral compression fractures) with a similar bone status, as measured at the spine by absorptiometry and at the iliac crest by histology (see part I of this study). Despite the similarity in the mass of trabecular bone at either site, the results showed a significant difference (p < 0. 05) in the number of "real" trabecular termini between the groups, such that the fracture group had almost four times as many termini (mean +/- SE: 1.98 +/- 0.51/30 mm(2)) at the iliac crest as the nonfracture group (mean +/- SE: 0.53 +/- 0.31/30 mm(2)). Previous histomorphometry of the same material failed to detect a structural distinction between the two groups using established variables. It was concluded that a mass-independent trabecular discontinuity contributes to skeletal failure and that determination of the number of "real" disconnections (i.e., unstained termini) by the direct method proposed may provide a more sensitive discriminant of fracture than the present indirect procedures. A group of fracture and nonfracture men (see part I) suggested a similar distinction (fracture: 0.69 +/- 0.30/30 mm(2); nonfracture: 0.18 +/- 0.18/30 mm(2)), although the difference was not significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10913922     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00328-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  24 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Bone microarchitecture and strength.

Authors:  David W Dempster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  The vertebral fracture cascade in osteoporosis: a review of aetiopathogenesis.

Authors:  A M Briggs; A M Greig; J D Wark
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Paraspinal muscle control in people with osteoporotic vertebral fracture.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Trabecular bone structure parameters from 3D image processing of clinical multi-slice and cone-beam computed tomography data.

Authors:  Eva Klintström; Orjan Smedby; Rodrigo Moreno; Torkel B Brismar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-11-24       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The effect of osteoporotic vertebral fracture on predicted spinal loads in vivo.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Tim V Wrigley; Jaap H van Dieën; Bev Phillips; Sing Kai Lo; Alison M Greig; Kim L Bennell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Microarchitectural changes in the aging skeleton.

Authors:  Yankel Gabet; Itai Bab
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.096

9.  Severity of vertebral fracture reflects deterioration of bone microarchitecture.

Authors:  H K Genant; P D Delmas; P Chen; Y Jiang; E F Eriksen; G P Dalsky; R Marcus; J San Martin
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-10-07       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Retrospective 3D registration of trabecular bone MR images for longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Jeremy F Magland; Catherine E Jones; Mary B Leonard; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.