Alfred K Pfister1, Christine A Welch1, Molly John1, Mary K Emmett1. 1. From the Department of Medicine, West Virginia School of Medicine, Charleston, and the Department of Health Services and Outcomes Research, Charleston Area Medical Center Health Education and Research Institute, Charleston, West Virginia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Osteopenia is considerably more common than osteoporosis and accounts for most of the fracture burden in women older than 50 years. It is uncertain when to initiate treatment in osteopenia. We sought to determine in women with osteopenia what effect transitioning to lower categories had on subsequent fracturing. METHODS: We surveyed 1150 women from office-based practices who had initial normal or osteopenic bone mineral densities (BMDs) and who were retested after 5.75 years. We classified categories related to baseline T scores as follows: normal (>-1.0), mild osteopenia (-1.0 to -1.49), moderate osteopenia (-1.5 to -1.99), and severe osteopenia (-2.0 to -2.49). We determined during a 9.6-year follow-up period the fracture occurrence in those who maintained their initial category status or transitioned into lower categories. RESULTS: Transitioning to lower categories was not significantly different among baseline osteopenic categories but significantly more than normal baseline BMDs. Total fractures, individuals fracturing, and major fractures were significantly more, with baseline T scores of ≤-1.5 (<0.001). Although only 10.2% transitioned to osteoporosis, 90.5% of these transitions occurred with baseline T scores ≤-1.5 and accounted for significantly more fractures than baseline T scores of >-1.5. CONCLUSIONS: Most subsequent fractures and transitions to osteoporosis occurred with baseline T scores ≤-1.5. Clinical risk factors need to be used to determine at what T score threshold treatment would be cost effective.
OBJECTIVES:Osteopenia is considerably more common than osteoporosis and accounts for most of the fracture burden in women older than 50 years. It is uncertain when to initiate treatment in osteopenia. We sought to determine in women with osteopenia what effect transitioning to lower categories had on subsequent fracturing. METHODS: We surveyed 1150 women from office-based practices who had initial normal or osteopenic bone mineral densities (BMDs) and who were retested after 5.75 years. We classified categories related to baseline T scores as follows: normal (>-1.0), mild osteopenia (-1.0 to -1.49), moderate osteopenia (-1.5 to -1.99), and severe osteopenia (-2.0 to -2.49). We determined during a 9.6-year follow-up period the fracture occurrence in those who maintained their initial category status or transitioned into lower categories. RESULTS: Transitioning to lower categories was not significantly different among baseline osteopenic categories but significantly more than normal baseline BMDs. Total fractures, individuals fracturing, and major fractures were significantly more, with baseline T scores of ≤-1.5 (<0.001). Although only 10.2% transitioned to osteoporosis, 90.5% of these transitions occurred with baseline T scores ≤-1.5 and accounted for significantly more fractures than baseline T scores of >-1.5. CONCLUSIONS: Most subsequent fractures and transitions to osteoporosis occurred with baseline T scores ≤-1.5. Clinical risk factors need to be used to determine at what T score threshold treatment would be cost effective.
Authors: John A Kanis; Anders Oden; Helena Johansson; Fredrik Borgström; Oskar Ström; Eugene McCloskey Journal: Bone Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Alan O Malabanan; Harold N Rosen; Tamara J Vokes; Chad L Deal; Jimmy D Alele; Thomas P Olenginski; John T Schousboe Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2013-09-20 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Jane A Cauley; John Robbins; Zhao Chen; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca D Jackson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Meryl LeBoff; Cora E Lewis; Joan McGowan; Joan Neuner; Mary Pettinger; Marcia L Stefanick; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Nelson B Watts Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Dennis M Black; Robert W Downs; Somnath Sarkar; Thomas Fuerst; Roberta J Secrest; Imre Pavo Journal: Bone Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Glenn A Ladinsky; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Michael Wald; Babette S Zemel; Peter J Snyder; Louise Loh; Hee Kwon Song; Punam K Saha; Alexander C Wright; Felix W Wehrli Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Yohann Bala; Roger Zebaze; Ali Ghasem-Zadeh; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sandra Iuliano; James M Peterson; Shreyasee Amin; Åshild Bjørnerem; L Joseph Melton; Helena Johansson; John A Kanis; Sundeep Khosla; Ego Seeman Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Lisa Langsetmo; David Goltzman; Christopher S Kovacs; Jonathan D Adachi; David A Hanley; Nancy Kreiger; Robert Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou; Wojciech P Olszynski; Sophie A Jamal Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sanford Baim; Charles R Wilson; E Michael Lewiecki; Marjorie M Luckey; Robert W Downs; Brian C Lentle Journal: J Clin Densitom Date: 2005 Impact factor: 2.963
Authors: Emily M Stein; X Sherry Liu; Thomas L Nickolas; Adi Cohen; Valerie Thomas; Donald J McMahon; Chiyuan Zhang; Perry T Yin; Felicia Cosman; Jeri Nieves; X Edward Guo; Elizabeth Shane Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2010-06-18 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Sifat Maria; Mark H Swanson; Larry T Enderby; Frank D'Amico; Brianna Enderby; Rebekah M Samsonraj; Amel Dudakovic; Andre J van Wijnen; Paula A Witt-Enderby Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2017-01-26 Impact factor: 5.682