Literature DB >> 2240315

How valid are mammography self-reports?

E S King1, B K Rimer, B Trock, A Balshem, P Engstrom.   

Abstract

We compared mammography reports in medical records to self-reports obtained during a 1989 telephone interview survey for a sample of 100 women members of a health maintenance organization (HMO) who indicated they had mammograms within the past year and 100 who said they had not had mammograms within the past year. Of the women reporting they had not had mammograms within the past year, none had mammogram reports in the HMO data center. Of the 100 women reporting they had mammograms within the past year, 94 had confirmatory radiology records.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2240315      PMCID: PMC1404903          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.80.11.1386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  Increasing the effort toward breast cancer detection.

Authors:  M D Wertheimer; M E Costanza; T F Dodson; C D'Orsi; H Pastides; J G Zapka
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Discrepancies between self-reported and validated cigarette smoking in a community survey of New Mexico Hispanics.

Authors:  D B Coultas; C A Howard; G T Peake; B J Skipper; J M Samet
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1988-04

3.  Reducing avoidable cancer mortality through prevention and early detection regimens.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Rimer; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Accuracy of women's self-report of their last Pap smear.

Authors:  J A Sawyer; J A Earp; R H Fletcher; F F Daye; T M Wynn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Interviewing older adults: the accuracy of factual information.

Authors:  W L Rodgers; A R Herzog
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1987-07

6.  District programme to reduce smoking: effect of clinic supported brief intervention by general practitioners.

Authors:  M A Russell; J A Stapleton; P H Jackson; P Hajek; M Belcher
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-11-14

7.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Duration of relative protection of screening for cervical cancer.

Authors:  D D Celentano; A C Klassen; C S Weisman; N B Rosenshein
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden.

Authors:  L Tabár; A Gad; L Holmberg; U Ljungquist
Journal:  Diagn Imaging Clin Med       Date:  1985
  9 in total
  48 in total

1.  Subgroup-specific effects of questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence.

Authors:  P Z Siegel; J R Qualters; P D Mowery; S Campostrini; C Leutzinger; D V McQueen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparing narrative and informational videos to increase mammography in low-income African American women.

Authors:  Matthew W Kreuter; Kathleen Holmes; Kassandra Alcaraz; Bindu Kalesan; Suchitra Rath; Melissa Richert; Amy McQueen; Nikki Caito; Lou Robinson; Eddie M Clark
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-11-10

3.  The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent mammography participation.

Authors:  Susan E Jelinski; Colleen J Maxwell; Jay Onysko; Christina M Bancej
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  C Lerman; E Ross; A Boyce; P M Gorchov; R McLaughlin; B Rimer; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Multistrategy health education program to increase mammography use among women ages 65 and older.

Authors:  B K Rimer; N Resch; E King; E Ross; C Lerman; A Boyce; H Kessler; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Bias associated with self-report of prior screening mammography.

Authors:  Kathleen A Cronin; Diana L Miglioretti; Martin Krapcho; Binbing Yu; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Eric J Feuer; Nancy Breen; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  HIV prevention services received at health care and HIV test providers by young men who have sex with men: an examination of racial disparities.

Authors:  Stephanie K Behel; Duncan A MacKellar; Linda A Valleroy; Gina M Secura; Trista Bingham; David D Celentano; Beryl A Koblin; Marlene Lalota; Douglas Shehan; Lucia V Torian
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Validating self-reported mammography use in vulnerable communities: findings and recommendations.

Authors:  Kristi L Allgood; Garth H Rauscher; Steven Whitman; Giselle Vasquez-Jones; Ami M Shah
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer.

Authors:  M R Andersen; N Urban
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.