Literature DB >> 11344896

Subgroup-specific effects of questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence.

P Z Siegel1, J R Qualters, P D Mowery, S Campostrini, C Leutzinger, D V McQueen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated whether an apparent downturn in prevalence rates of mammography use reported in the 1992 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) questionnaire resulted from a change in questionnaire wording.
METHODS: In a pretest-posttest design (1990-1991 vs 1992), piecewise linear regression analyses were based on monthly prevalence estimates of mammography use among female BRFSS respondents 40 years or older.
RESULTS: Self-reported mammography use was lower by 3.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5, 5.5) overall--and lower by 13.6 percentage points (95% CI = 2.6, 24.6) among Black women with less than a high school education--when predicted from 1992 data than when predicted from 1990-1991 data.
CONCLUSIONS: A change in questionnaire wording in the BRFSS caused demographic-specific effects in population-based estimates of mammography use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11344896      PMCID: PMC1446659          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.5.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  How valid are mammography self-reports?

Authors:  E S King; B K Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P Engstrom
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps?

Authors:  L M Martin; E E Calle; P A Wingo; C W Heath
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Accuracy of Pap smear and mammogram self-reports in a southwestern Native American tribe.

Authors:  C S Johnson; J Archer; D Campos-Outcalt
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Do chart reviews and interviews provide the same information about breast and cervical cancer screening?

Authors:  S Whitman; L Lacey; D Ansell; E H Chen; J Dell; C W Phillips
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 7.196

5.  The use of mammography vans by low-income women: the accuracy of self-reports.

Authors:  S Etzi; D S Lane; R Grimson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Design, characteristics, and usefulness of state-based behavioral risk factor surveillance: 1981-87.

Authors:  P L Remington; M Y Smith; D F Williamson; R F Anda; E M Gentry; G C Hogelin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Changes in the use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  N Breen; L Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Breast screening by African-American women: insights from a household survey and focus groups.

Authors:  N L Danigelis; N L Roberson; J K Worden; B S Flynn; A L Dorwaldt; J A Ashley; J M Skelly; R M Mickey
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  The behavioral risk factor surveys: II. Design, methods, and estimates from combined state data.

Authors:  E M Gentry; W D Kalsbeek; G C Hogelin; J T Jones; K L Gaines; M R Forman; J S Marks; F L Trowbridge
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Measuring the use of mammography: two methods compared.

Authors:  D Degnan; R Harris; J Ranney; D Quade; J A Earp; J Gonzalez
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 9.308

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence.

Authors:  Alacey Berumen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Questionnaire wording on population-based estimates of mammography prevalence.

Authors:  Alacey Berumen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  An assessment of state level sexual assault prevalence estimates.

Authors:  Sharyn J Potter; David J Laflamme
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2011-01

4.  Healthcare access and mammography screening in Michigan: a multilevel cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Tomi F Akinyemiju; Amr S Soliman; May Yassine; Mousumi Banerjee; Kendra Schwartz; Sofia Merajver
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2012-03-21

5.  Misclassification of survey responses and black-white disparity in mammography use, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1995-2006.

Authors:  Rashid Njai; Paul Z Siegel; Jacqueline W Miller; Youlian Liao
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.830

6.  Disparities in preventive procedures: comparisons of self-report and Medicare claims data.

Authors:  Kevin Fiscella; Kathleen Holt; Sean Meldrum; Peter Franks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  An overview: expanding the women's health research frontier.

Authors:  M G Davenport
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2001
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.