Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

Literature DB >> 1566953

The impact of mailing psychoeducational materials to women with abnormal mammograms.

C Lerman¹, E Ross, A Boyce, P M Gorchov, R McLaughlin, B Rimer, P Engstrom.

Abstract

A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate the impact of mailed psychoeducational materials on adherence to subsequent annual mammography among women with prior abnormal mammograms. The results showed a 13% increment in adherence among women who received this intervention. This effect was independent of all sociodemographic and medical variables examined. We conclude that mailed psychoeducational materials may be an effective mechanism to improve adherence among women with abnormal mammogram results.

Entities: Species

Mesh：

Year: 1992 PMID： 1566953 PMCID： PMC1694134 DOI： 10.2105/ajph.82.5.729

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Public Health ISSN： 0090-0036 Impact factor: 9.308

11 in total

1. How valid are mammography self-reports?

Authors: E S King; B K Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P Engstrom
Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 1990-11 Impact factor: 9.308

2. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

Authors: C Lerman; B Rimer; B Trock; A Balshem; P F Engstrom
Journal: Prev Med Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 4.018

3. Reducing avoidable cancer mortality through prevention and early detection regimens.

Authors: C Lerman; B Rimer; P F Engstrom
Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1989-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701

4. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior.

Authors: B E Meyerowitz; S Chaiken
Journal: J Pers Soc Psychol Date: 1987-03

5. A television-promoted mammography screening pilot project in the Chicago metropolitan area.

Authors: D P Winchester; H J Lasky; J Sylvester; M L Maher
Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 1988 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 508.702

6. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.

Authors: A Tversky; D Kahneman
Journal: Science Date: 1981-01-30 Impact factor: 47.728

7. Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.

Authors: C Lerman; B Trock; B K Rimer; A Boyce; C Jepson; P F Engstrom
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 1991-04-15 Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8. Cancer risk notification: psychosocial and ethical implications.

Authors: C Lerman; B K Rimer; P F Engstrom
Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1991-07 Impact factor: 44.544

9. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors: B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal: Radiology Date: 1989-07 Impact factor: 11.105

10. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease.

Authors: W D Dupont; D L Page
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1985-01-17 Impact factor: 91.245

7 in total

Review 1. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening.

Authors: Roshan Bastani; K Robin Yabroff; Ronald E Myers; Beth Glenn
Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2. Adherence and psychological adjustment among women at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors: C Lerman; M Schwartz
Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 1993-11 Impact factor: 4.872

3. How to reduce the effect of framing on messages about health.

Authors: Rocio Garcia-Retamero; Mirta Galesic
Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-08-25 Impact factor: 5.128

4. Perceived susceptibility to breast cancer moderates the effect of gain- and loss-framed messages on use of screening mammography.

Authors: Kristel M Gallagher; John A Updegraff; Alexander J Rothman; Linda Sims
Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 4.267