Literature DB >> 19602864

Not without my permission: parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research.

B A Tarini1, A Goldenberg, D Singer, S J Clark, A Butchart, M M Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: State newborn screening (NBS) programs are considering the storage and use of NBS blood samples for research. However, no systematic assessment of parents' attitudes exists.
METHODS: We conducted an Internet-based survey of a nationally representative parent sample. We examined parents' willingness (1) to permit use of their children's NBS samples for research with/without their permission and (2) to allow NBS sample storage. Using bivariate and multinomial logistic regression, we examined the association of parent and child characteristics with parents' willingness to permit NBS sample storage and use for research, respectively.
RESULTS: The response rate was 49.5%. If permission is obtained, 76.2% of parents were 'very or somewhat willing' to permit use of the NBS sample for research. If permission is not obtained, only 28.2% of parents were 'very or somewhat willing'. Of parents surveyed, 78% would permit storage of their children's NBS sample. Parents who refused NBS sample storage were also less willing to permit use of the NBS sample for research.
CONCLUSIONS: Three-quarters of parents would permit use of their children's NBS samples for research - if their permission is obtained. Parents not in favor of storing NBS samples often opposed the use of NBS samples for research. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19602864     DOI: 10.1159/000228724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  32 in total

1.  Public attitudes regarding the use of residual newborn screening specimens for research.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca Anderson; Louisa Stark; Aaron Goldenberg; Michelle Lewis; Matthew Burbank; Bob Wong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Attitudes of Mothers Regarding Willingness to Enroll Their Children in Research.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  From newborn screening to population health research: implementation of the Michigan BioTrust for health.

Authors:  Carrie Langbo; Janice Bach; Mary Kleyn; Frances Pouch Downes
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Public interest in medical research participation: differences by volunteer status and study type.

Authors:  Enesha M Cobb; Dianne C Singer; Matthew M Davis
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.689

5.  There will be blood.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Storage and use of Newborn Screening Blood Specimens for Research: Assessing Public Opinion in Illinois.

Authors:  Alexa Hart; Michael Petros; Joel Charrow; Claudia Nash; Catherine Wicklund
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Public concerns regarding the storage and secondary uses of residual newborn bloodspots: an analysis of print media, legal cases, and public engagement activities.

Authors:  Shannon Cunningham; Kieran C O'Doherty; Karine Sénécal; David Secko; Denise Avard
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-12-23

Review 8.  Retention and research use of residual newborn screening bloodspots.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; Aaron J Goldenberg; Erin Rothwell; Rebecca A Anderson; Michelle Huckaby Lewis
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 7.124

9.  Attitudes about the use of newborn dried blood spots for research: a survey of underrepresented parents.

Authors:  Kristin S Hendrix; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Feasibility of neonatal dried blood spot retrieval amid evolving state policies (2009-2010): a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Amy M Linabery; Megan E Slater; Logan G Spector; Andrew F Olshan; Susan K Stork; Michelle A Roesler; Gregory H Reaman; Julie A Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 3.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.