Literature DB >> 22389209

Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: a pilot study of an approach to ethics education.

Roberta M Berry1, Jason Borenstein, Robert J Butera.   

Abstract

This manuscript describes a pilot study in ethics education employing a problem-based learning approach to the study of novel, complex, ethically fraught, unavoidably public, and unavoidably divisive policy problems, called "fractious problems," in bioscience and biotechnology. Diverse graduate and professional students from four US institutions and disciplines spanning science, engineering, humanities, social science, law, and medicine analyzed fractious problems employing "navigational skills" tailored to the distinctive features of these problems. The students presented their results to policymakers, stakeholders, experts, and members of the public. This approach may provide a model for educating future bioscientists and bioengineers so that they can meaningfully contribute to the social understanding and resolution of challenging policy problems generated by their work.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22389209     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-012-9359-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  10 in total

Review 1.  The absent professor: why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Roberta M Berry
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Teaching health law: problem-based learning regarding "fractious problems" in health law: reflections on an educational experiment.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics.

Authors:  Michael Davis; Alan Feinerman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2010-11-21       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Ethics education at NSF--commentary on "Standards for evaluating proposals to develop ethics curricula".

Authors:  Rachelle D Hollander
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach.

Authors:  Wendy C Newstetter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Using cases with contrary facts to illustrate and facilitate ethical analysis.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  A small bioethical world?

Authors:  Roberta M Berry
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2011-03

8.  The Engineering and Science Issues Test (ESIT): a discipline-specific approach to assessing moral judgment.

Authors:  Jason Borenstein; Matthew J Drake; Robert Kirkman; Julie L Swann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 9.  Aggression, psychopathy and brain imaging - Review and future recommendations.

Authors:  Katarina Wahlund; Marianne Kristiansson
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-05

10.  Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: a functional MRI investigation.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Kalina J Michalska; Yuko Akitsuki; Benjamin B Lahey
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.251

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Navigating Bioethical Waters: Two Pilot Projects in Problem-Based Learning for Future Bioscience and Biotechnology Professionals.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry; Aaron D Levine; Robert Kirkman; Laura Palucki Blake; Matthew Drake
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering.

Authors:  Jonathan Beever; Andrew O Brightman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 3.  Review of Instructional Approaches in Ethics Education.

Authors:  Tyler J Mulhearn; Logan M Steele; Logan L Watts; Kelsey E Medeiros; Michael D Mumford; Shane Connelly
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  A Meta-analytic Comparison of Face-to-Face and Online Delivery in Ethics Instruction: The Case for a Hybrid Approach.

Authors:  E Michelle Todd; Logan L Watts; Tyler J Mulhearn; Brett S Torrence; Megan R Turner; Shane Connelly; Michael D Mumford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a collaborative learning and argument visualization approach.

Authors:  Michael Hoffmann; Jason Borenstein
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke; Zach Piso; Kyle Whyte; Sean Valles
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Reflective Consensus Building on Wicked Problems with the Reflect! Platform.

Authors:  Michael H G Hoffmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Smart Teaching Matters! Applying the Research on Learning to Teaching RCR.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2014-12-15

10.  Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Zachary Piso; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.