Literature DB >> 27027317

The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.

Troy E Hall1, Jesse Engebretson2, Michael O'Rourke3, Zach Piso3, Kyle Whyte3, Sean Valles3.   

Abstract

Professionals in environmental fields engage with complex problems that involve stakeholders with different values, different forms of knowledge, and contentious decisions. There is increasing recognition of the need to train graduate students in interdisciplinary environmental science programs (IESPs) in these issues, which we refer to as "social ethics." A literature review revealed topics and skills that should be included in such training, as well as potential challenges and barriers. From this review, we developed an online survey, which we administered to faculty from 81 United States colleges and universities offering IESPs (480 surveys were completed). Respondents overwhelmingly agreed that IESPs should address values in applying science to policy and management decisions. They also agreed that programs should engage students with issues related to norms of scientific practice. Agreement was slightly less strong that IESPs should train students in skills related to managing value conflicts among different stakeholders. The primary challenges to incorporating social ethics into the curriculum were related to the lack of materials and expertise for delivery, though challenges such as ethics being marginalized in relation to environmental science content were also prominent. Challenges related to students' interest in ethics were considered less problematic. Respondents believed that social ethics are most effectively delivered when incorporated into existing courses, and they preferred case studies or problem-based learning for delivery. Student competence is generally not assessed, and respondents recognized a need for both curricular materials and assessment tools.

Keywords:  Graduate education; Interdisciplinary research; Natural resource decision making; Social ethics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27027317     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9775-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  16 in total

Review 1.  The absent professor: why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Roberta M Berry
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.229

2.  Using team-based learning to prepare medical students for future problem-based learning.

Authors:  Nahed Abdelkhalek; Amal Hussein; Trevor Gibbs; Hossam Hamdy
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

3.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.

Authors:  Joseph R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Reasons scientists avoid thinking about ethics.

Authors:  Paul Root Wolpe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach.

Authors:  Wendy C Newstetter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  On advocacy by environmental scientists: what, whether, why, and how.

Authors:  Michael P Nelson; John A Vucetich
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.560

7.  A case study of teaching social responsibility to doctoral students in the climate sciences.

Authors:  Tom Børsen; Avan N Antia; Mirjam Sophia Glessmer
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Environmental justice, values, and scientific expertise.

Authors:  Daniel Steel; Kyle Powys Whyte
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2012-06

9.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report.

Authors:  James M Dubois; Jeffrey M Dueker
Journal:  J Res Adm       Date:  2009

10.  Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists.

Authors:  Jennifer Blair McCormick; Angie M Boyce; Jennifer M Ladd; Mildred Cho
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012-06-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities.

Authors:  Dianne Quigley; Alana Levine; David A Sonnenfeld; Phil Brown; Qing Tian; Xiaofan Wei
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Evaluating a dialogue-based approach to teaching about values and policy in graduate transdisciplinary environmental science programs.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Zachary Piso; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.