Literature DB >> 18273693

Using cases with contrary facts to illustrate and facilitate ethical analysis.

Steven S Coughlin1.   

Abstract

There has been increasing interest in developing practical, non-theoretical tools for analyzing ethical problems in public health, biomedicine, and other scientific disciplines so that professionals can make and justify ethical decisions in their own research or practice. Tools for ethical decisionmaking, together with case studies on ethics, are often used in graduate education programs and in continuing professional education. Students can benefit from opportunities to further develop their analytical skills, to recognize ethical issues, and to develop their moral sensitivity. One practical approach for illustrating and facilitating ethical analysis uses cases with contrary facts and circumstances, an approach which complements rather than replaces theoretical approaches to moral reasoning. Cases with contrary facts and circumstances are presented in two or more alternative ways so that the facts, circumstances, or framing of one version runs counter to that of the other version (s). Cases with contrary facts, together with practical steps for identifying and analyzing ethical issues, are likely to be useful tools for illustrating and facilitating ethics analysis and stimulating the moral imagination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18273693     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9055-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  11 in total

1.  Common morality as an alternative to principlism.

Authors:  K Danner Clouser
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  1995-09

2.  Implementing ethics in the professions: examples from environmental epidemiology.

Authors:  Colin L Soskolne; Lee E Sieswerda
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Using the case-study methodology to teach ethics to public health students.

Authors:  Donna E Howard; Christine Lothen-Kline; Bradley O Boekeloo
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2004-04

4.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: microethics and macroethics in engineering.

Authors:  Joseph R Herkert
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  Making the morally relevant features explicit: a response to Carson Strong.

Authors:  Bernard Gert
Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J       Date:  2006-03

6.  The use of moral dilemmas for teaching agricultural engineers.

Authors:  J Félix Lozano; Guillermo Palau-Salvador; Vincent Gozálvez; Alejandra Boni
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Unesco's Global Ethics Observatory.

Authors:  H ten Have; T W Ang
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Model curricula in public health ethics.

Authors:  S S Coughlin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Teaching medical ethics: some persistent questions and some responses.

Authors:  E D Pellegrino
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Global health and moral values.

Authors:  Sabina Alkire; Lincoln Chen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Sep 18-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  2 in total

1.  Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: a pilot study of an approach to ethics education.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry; Jason Borenstein; Robert J Butera
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Understanding ill-structured engineering ethics problems through a collaborative learning and argument visualization approach.

Authors:  Michael Hoffmann; Jason Borenstein
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.525

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.