Literature DB >> 25697306

Reflexive Principlism as an Effective Approach for Developing Ethical Reasoning in Engineering.

Jonathan Beever1, Andrew O Brightman2.   

Abstract

An important goal of teaching ethics to engineering students is to enhance their ability to make well-reasoned ethical decisions in their engineering practice: a goal in line with the stated ethical codes of professional engineering organizations. While engineering educators have explored a wide range of methodologies for teaching ethics, a satisfying model for developing ethical reasoning skills has not been adopted broadly. In this paper we argue that a principlist-based approach to ethical reasoning is uniquely suited to engineering ethics education. Reflexive Principlism is an approach to ethical decision-making that focuses on internalizing a reflective and iterative process of specification, balancing, and justification of four core ethical principles in the context of specific cases. In engineering, that approach provides structure to ethical reasoning while allowing the flexibility for adaptation to varying contexts through specification. Reflexive Principlism integrates well with the prevalent and familiar methodologies of reasoning within the engineering disciplines as well as with the goals of engineering ethics education.

Keywords:  Engineering ethics; Ethical reasoning; Moral framework; Reflectivity; Reflexive principlism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25697306     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  16 in total

1.  The professional approach to engineering ethics: five research questions.

Authors:  M Davis
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.

Authors:  J Haidt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Teaching of ethics in biomedical engineering.

Authors:  Stan A Napper; Paul N Hale
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  1993-12

4.  The defining issues test and the four component model: contributions to professional education.

Authors:  Muriel J Bebeau
Journal:  J Moral Educ       Date:  2002-09

5.  Hidden in plain view: feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics.

Authors:  Donna Riley
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Assessment of moral judgment of BME and other health sciences students.

Authors:  Jorge E Monzon; Olga L Ariasgago; Alvaro Monzon-Wyngaard
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

7.  A model for teaching research ethics.

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Kathy P Parker
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Moral pedagogy and practical ethics.

Authors:  Chuclk Huff; William Frey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Fostering integrative problem solving in biomedical engineering: the PBL approach.

Authors:  Wendy C Newstetter
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Ethics and biomedical engineering education: the continual defiance.

Authors:  Jorge E Monzon; Alvaro Monzon-Wyngaard
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009
View more
  1 in total

1.  A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.

Authors:  Justin L Hess; Grant Fore
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.