Literature DB >> 12762924

The absent professor: why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.

Arri Eisen1, Roberta M Berry.   

Abstract

Research ethics education in the biosciences has not historically been a priority for research universities despite the fact that funding agencies, government regulators, and the parties involved in the research enterprise agree that it ought to be. The confluence of a number of factors, including scrutiny and regulation due to increased public awareness of the impact of basic research on society, increased public and private funding, increased diversity and collaboration among researchers, the impressive success and speed of research advances, and high-profile cases of misconduct, have made it necessary to reexamine how the bioscience research community at all levels provides ethics education to its own. We discuss the need to and reasons for making ethics integral to the education of bioscientists, approaches to achieving this goal, challenges this goal presents, and responses to those challenges.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12762924     DOI: 10.1162/152651602320957556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  20 in total

1.  Contentious problems in bioscience and biotechnology: a pilot study of an approach to ethics education.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry; Jason Borenstein; Robert J Butera
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Navigating Bioethical Waters: Two Pilot Projects in Problem-Based Learning for Future Bioscience and Biotechnology Professionals.

Authors:  Roberta M Berry; Aaron D Levine; Robert Kirkman; Laura Palucki Blake; Matthew Drake
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A model for teaching research ethics.

Authors:  Arri Eisen; Kathy P Parker
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Supervisor-student relations: examining the spectrum of conflicts of interest in bioscience laboratories.

Authors:  Chris MacDonald; Bryn Williams-Jones
Journal:  Account Res       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Why should nanoscience students be taught to be ethically competent?

Authors:  Anna Julie Rasmussen; Mette Ebbesen
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  The Need for Social Ethics in Interdisciplinary Environmental Science Graduate Programs: Results from a Nation-Wide Survey in the United States.

Authors:  Troy E Hall; Jesse Engebretson; Michael O'Rourke; Zach Piso; Kyle Whyte; Sean Valles
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.525

7.  Mentoring for Responsible Research: The Creation of a Curriculum for Faculty to Teach RCR in the Research Environment.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.525

8.  Research Ethics: Researchers Consider How Best to Prevent Misconduct in Research in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions Through Ethics Education.

Authors:  Angelina Patrick Olesen; Latifah Amin; Zurina Mahadi
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Measures of Mentoring, Department Climate, and Graduate Student Preparedness in the Responsible Conduct of Psychological Research.

Authors:  Celia B Fisher; Adam L Fried; Sabrina J Goodman; Kaori Kubo Germano
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2009-05-01

10.  Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research.

Authors:  Dena K Plemmons; Suzanne A Brody; Michael W Kalichman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.525

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.