Literature DB >> 22380391

The dosimetric impact of inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plan modulation for real-time dynamic MLC tracking delivery.

Marianne Falk1, Tobias Larsson, Paul Keall, Byung Chul Cho, Marianne Aznar, Stine Korreman, Per Poulsen, Per Munck Af Rosenschold.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Real-time dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) tracking for management of intrafraction tumor motion can be challenging for highly modulated beams, as the leaves need to travel far to adjust for target motion perpendicular to the leaf travel direction. The plan modulation can be reduced by using a leaf position constraint (LPC) that reduces the difference in the position of adjacent MLC leaves in the plan. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the LPC on the quality of inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plans and the effect of the MLC motion pattern on the dosimetric accuracy of MLC tracking delivery. Specifically, the possibility of predicting the accuracy of MLC tracking delivery based on the plan modulation was investigated.
METHODS: Inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plans were created on CT-data of three lung cancer patients. For each case, five plans with a single 358° arc were generated with LPC priorities of 0 (no LPC), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 (highest possible LPC), respectively. All the plans had a prescribed dose of 2 Gy × 30, used 6 MV, a maximum dose rate of 600 MU/min and a collimator angle of 45° or 315°. To quantify the plan modulation, an average adjacent leaf distance (ALD) was calculated by averaging the mean adjacent leaf distance for each control point. The linear relationship between the plan quality [i.e., the calculated dose distributions and the number of monitor units (MU)] and the LPC was investigated, and the linear regression coefficient as well as a two tailed confidence level of 95% was used in the evaluation. The effect of the plan modulation on the performance of MLC tracking was tested by delivering the plans to a cylindrical diode array phantom moving with sinusoidal motion in the superior-inferior direction with a peak-to-peak displacement of 2 cm and a cycle time of 6 s. The delivery was adjusted to the target motion using MLC tracking, guided in real-time by an infrared optical system. The dosimetric results were evaluated using gamma index evaluation with static target measurements as reference.
RESULTS: The plan quality parameters did not depend significantly on the LPC (p ≥ 0.066), whereas the ALD depended significantly on the LPC (p < 0.001). The gamma index failure rate depended significantly on the ALD, weighted to the percentage of the beam delivered in each control point of the plan (ALD(w)) when MLC tracking was used (p < 0.001), but not for delivery without MLC tracking (p ≥ 0.342). The gamma index failure rate with the criteria of 2% and 2 mm was decreased from > 33.9% without MLC tracking to <31.4% (LPC 0) and <2.2% (LPC 1) with MLC tracking.
CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the dosimetric robustness of MLC tracking delivery of an inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plan can be improved by incorporating leaf position constraints in the objective function without otherwise affecting the plan quality. The dosimetric robustness may be estimated prior to delivery by evaluating the ALD(w) of the plan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22380391      PMCID: PMC3306442          DOI: 10.1118/1.3685583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  32 in total

Review 1.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality.

Authors:  C C Ling; J Humm; S Larson; H Amols; Z Fuks; S Leibel; J A Koutcher
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Effects of motion on the total dose distribution.

Authors:  Thomas Bortfeld; Steve B Jiang; Eike Rietzel
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  Dynamic MLC tracking of moving targets with a single kV imager for 3D conformal and IMRT treatments.

Authors:  Per R Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Amit Sawant; Dan Ruan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.089

4.  Determining parameters for respiration-gated radiotherapy.

Authors:  S S Vedam; P J Keall; V R Kini; R Mohan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Electromagnetic-guided dynamic multileaf collimator tracking enables motion management for intensity-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Amit Sawant; Byungchul Cho; Dan Ruan; Junqing Wu; Per Poulsen; Jay Petersen; Laurence J Newell; Herbert Cattell; Stine Korreman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Real-time tumor tracking: automatic compensation of target motion using the Siemens 160 MLC.

Authors:  Martin B Tacke; Simeon Nill; Andreas Krauss; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Real-time dynamic MLC tracking for inversely optimized arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Per Munck af Rosenschöld; Paul Keall; Herbert Cattell; Byung Chul Cho; Per Poulsen; Sergey Povzner; Amit Sawant; Jens Zimmerman; Stine Korreman
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Precise and real-time measurement of 3D tumor motion in lung due to breathing and heartbeat, measured during radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yvette Seppenwoolde; Hiroki Shirato; Kei Kitamura; Shinichi Shimizu; Marcel van Herk; Joos V Lebesque; Kazuo Miyasaka
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Irradiation synchronized with respiration gate.

Authors:  K Ohara; T Okumura; M Akisada; T Inada; T Mori; H Yokota; M J Calaguas
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: an alternative to tomotherapy.

Authors:  C X Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  6 in total

1.  The impact of leaf width and plan complexity on DMLC tracking of prostate intensity modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per Rugaard Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Time-resolved dose distributions to moving targets during volumetric modulated arc therapy with and without dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Thomas Ravkilde; Paul J Keall; Cai Grau; Morten Høyer; Per R Poulsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Technical Note: In silico and experimental evaluation of two leaf-fitting algorithms for MLC tracking based on exposure error and plan complexity.

Authors:  Vincent Caillet; Ricky O'Brien; Douglas Moore; Per Poulsen; Tobias Pommer; Emma Colvill; Amit Sawant; Jeremy Booth; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Imaging and dosimetric errors in 4D PET/CT-guided radiotherapy from patient-specific respiratory patterns: a dynamic motion phantom end-to-end study.

Authors:  S R Bowen; M J Nyflot; C Herrmann; C M Groh; J Meyer; S D Wollenweber; C W Stearns; P E Kinahan; G A Sandison
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Dosimetric benefit of DMLC tracking for conventional and sub-volume boosted prostate intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per R Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Peter Meidahl Petersen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Motion management during IMAT treatment of mobile lung tumors--a comparison of MLC tracking and gated delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Pommer; Paul Keall; Stine Korreman; Gitte Persson; Per Poulsen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.