Literature DB >> 20831501

Dynamic MLC tracking of moving targets with a single kV imager for 3D conformal and IMRT treatments.

Per R Poulsen1, Byungchul Cho, Amit Sawant, Dan Ruan, Paul J Keall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor motion during radiotherapy is a major challenge for accurate dose delivery, in particular for hypofractionation and dose painting. The motion may be compensated by dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC) tracking. Previous work has demonstrated that a single kV imager can accurately localize moving targets for DMLC tracking during rotational delivery, however this method has not been investigated for the static gantry geometry used for conformal and IMRT treatments. In this study we investigate the accuracy of single kV-imager based DMLC tracking for static-gantry delivery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 5-field treatment plan with circular field shape and 200 MU per field was delivered in 20 s per field to a moving phantom with an embedded gold marker. Fluoroscopic kV images were acquired at 5 Hz perpendicular to the treatment beam axis during a 120° pre-treatment gantry rotation, during treatment delivery, and during inter-field gantry rotations. The three-dimensional marker position was estimated from the kV images and used for MLC adaptation. Experiments included 12 thoracic/abdominal tumor trajectories and five prostate trajectories selected from databases with 160 and 548 trajectories, respectively. The tracking error was determined as the mismatch between the marker position and the MLC aperture center in portal images. Simulations extended the study to all trajectories in the databases and to treatments with prolonged duration of 60 s per field.
RESULTS: In the experiments, the mean root-mean-square (rms) tracking error was 0.9 mm (perpendicular to MLC) and 1.1 mm (parallel to MLC) for thoracic/abdominal tumor trajectories and 0.6 mm (perpendicular) and 0.5 mm (parallel) for prostate trajectories. Simulations of these experiments agreed to within 0.1 mm. Simulations of all trajectories in the databases resulted in mean rms tracking errors of 0.6 mm (perpendicular) and 0.9 mm (parallel) for thorax/abdomen tumors and 0.4 mm (perpendicular) and 0.2 mm (parallel) for prostate for both 20 s and 60 s per field.
CONCLUSION: Single kV imager DMLC tracking, which is fully compatible with IMRT, was demonstrated for static fields. The mean tracking error was sub-2 mm for most tumor trajectories with respiratory motions and sub-1 mm for most prostate trajectories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20831501     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2010.498438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  18 in total

1.  Image-based dynamic multileaf collimator tracking of moving targets during intensity-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Walther Fledelius; Byungchul Cho; Paul Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  The dosimetric impact of inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plan modulation for real-time dynamic MLC tracking delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Larsson; Paul Keall; Byung Chul Cho; Marianne Aznar; Stine Korreman; Per Poulsen; Per Munck Af Rosenschold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Implementation and experimental results of 4D tumor tracking using robotic couch.

Authors:  I Buzurovic; Y Yu; M Werner-Wasik; T Biswas; P R Anne; A P Dicker; T K Podder
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The potential of positron emission tomography for intratreatment dynamic lung tumor tracking: a phantom study.

Authors:  Jaewon Yang; Tokihiro Yamamoto; Samuel R Mazin; Edward E Graves; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Kilovoltage intrafraction monitoring for prostate intensity modulated arc therapy: first clinical results.

Authors:  Jin Aun Ng; Jeremy T Booth; Per R Poulsen; Walther Fledelius; Esben Schjødt Worm; Thomas Eade; Fiona Hegi; Andrew Kneebone; Zdenka Kuncic; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Experimental investigation of a general real-time 3D target localization method using sequential kV imaging combined with respiratory monitoring.

Authors:  Byungchul Cho; Per Poulsen; Dan Ruan; Amit Sawant; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Intrafractional 3D localization using kilovoltage digital tomosynthesis for sliding-window intensity modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Pengpeng Zhang; Margie Hunt; Hai Pham; Grace Tang; Gig Mageras
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Motion management during IMAT treatment of mobile lung tumors--a comparison of MLC tracking and gated delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Pommer; Paul Keall; Stine Korreman; Gitte Persson; Per Poulsen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Four-dimensional dose distributions of step-and-shoot IMRT delivered with real-time tumor tracking for patients with irregular breathing: constant dose rate vs dose rate regulation.

Authors:  Xiaocheng Yang; Sarah Han-Oh; Minzhi Gui; Ying Niu; Cedric X Yu; Byong Yong Yi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Tumor motion tracking based on a four-dimensional computed tomography respiratory motion model driven by an ultrasound tracking technique.

Authors:  Lai-Lei Ting; Ho-Chiao Chuang; Ai-Ho Liao; Chia-Chun Kuo; Hsiao-Wei Yu; Hsin-Chuan Tsai; Der-Chi Tien; Shiu-Chen Jeng; Jeng-Fong Chiou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.