Literature DB >> 22378753

Effect of ambient light level at the monitor surface on digital radiographic evaluation of approximal carious lesions: an in vitro study.

K Hellén-Halme1, A Lith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated how ambient light affects the diagnostic accuracy of dental carious lesions on monitors used in dental practice. Specifically, the aim was to evaluate whether a monitor hood for blocking excess ambient light increases practitioners' ability to accurately diagnose carious lesions on digital radiographs under bright ambient light conditions.
METHODS: 7 observers evaluated approximal carious lesions on standardized digital radiographs of 100 teeth under 3 ambient light conditions: bright light (> 1000 lx) and dim light (<50 lx) with no monitor hood; and bright light with a hooded monitor. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for all observations. The criterion standard was a histological examination of the teeth. A paired t-test compared the effects of the three lighting conditions. The level of significance was set to p <0.05. Weighted kappa statistics estimated intraobserver agreement.
RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracy for dentine lesions was significantly higher in ambient light<50&hairsp ;lx than on monitors with and without a hood in ambient light>1000 lx. For all observers, diagnostic accuracy of dentine lesions under bright light was higher on a hooded monitor than on a monitor without a hood, but this difference was not significant. Intraobserver agreement varied from moderate to good.
CONCLUSION: Diagnostic accuracy of those carious lesions that reached into the dentine was significantly higher in ambient light<50 lx than in ambient light>1000 lx. A hooded monitor in bright light was not as effective as a monitor without a hood in dim light.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22378753      PMCID: PMC3520286          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15422221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  16 in total

1.  Influence of the digital image display monitor on observer performance.

Authors:  R A Cederberg; N L Frederiksen; B W Benson; J D Shulman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 2.  The choice of gold standard for evaluating tests for caries diagnosis.

Authors:  A Wenzel; H Hintze
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Ambient lighting: effect of illumination on soft-copy viewing of radiographs of the wrist.

Authors:  Patrick C Brennan; Mark McEntee; Michael Evanoff; Peter Phillips; William T O'Connor; David J Manning
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Digital radiography in general dental practice: a field study.

Authors:  K Hellén-Halme; M Nilsson; A Petersson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.

Authors:  K Hellén-Halme; A Petersson; G Warfvinge; M Nilsson
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Direct digital radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: a clinical study.

Authors:  B Kullendorff; K Petersson; M Rohlin
Journal:  Endod Dent Traumatol       Date:  1997-08

Review 7.  Work flow with digital intraoral radiography: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Anne Møystad
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.331

Review 8.  Digital radiography and caries diagnosis.

Authors:  A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Influence of education level and experience on detection of approximal caries in digital dental radiographs. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Gunnel Hänsel Petersson
Journal:  Swed Dent J       Date:  2010

10.  Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Kristina Hellén-Halme; Mats Nilsson; Arne Petersson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-02-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  Effect of display type, DICOM calibration and room illuminance in bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Soili Kallio-Pulkkinen; Sisko Huumonen; Marianne Haapea; Esa Liukkonen; Annina Sipola; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Carious lesions: diagnostic accuracy using pre-calibrated monitor in various ambient light levels: an in vitro study.

Authors:  K Hellén-Halme; A Lith
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison between DICOM-calibrated and uncalibrated consumer grade and 6-MP displays under different lighting conditions in panoramic radiography.

Authors:  S Kallio-Pulkkinen; M Haapea; E Liukkonen; S Huumonen; O Tervonen; M T Nieminen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.

Authors:  A D Cruz; I C Lobo; A L B Lemos; M F Aguiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Robin Snel; Ellen Van De Maele; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  The influence of ambient lighting on the detection of small contrast elements in digital dental radiographs.

Authors:  Till Schriewer; Ralf Schulze; Andreas Filippi; Irene Mischak; Michael Payer; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Sebastian Kühl
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-07       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Use of ambient lighting during colonoscopy and its effect on adenoma detection rate and eye fatigue: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryan T Hoff; Andrew Mazulis; Meghana Doniparthi; Assad Munis; Anne Rivelli; Asif Lakha; Eli Ehrenpreis
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-05-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.