Literature DB >> 25629721

Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.

A D Cruz1, I C Lobo, A L B Lemos, M F Aguiar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess how details on dental restorative composites with different radio-opacities are perceived under the influence of ambient light.
METHODS: Resin composite step wedges (six steps, each 1-mm thick) were custom manufactured from three materials, respectively: (M1) Filtek™ Z350 (3M/ESPE, Saint Paul, MN); (M2) Prisma AP.H™ (Dentsply International Inc., Brazil) and (M3) Glacier(®) (SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia). Each step of the manufactured wedge received three standardized drillings of different diameters and depths. An aluminium (Al) step wedge with 12 steps (1-mm thick) was used as an internal standard to calculate the radio-opacity as pixel intensity values. Standardized digital images of the set were obtained, and 11 observers independently recorded the images, noting the number of noticeable details (drillings) under 2 dissimilar conditions: in a light environment (light was turned on in the room) and in low-light conditions (light in the room was turned off). The differences between images in terms of the number of details that were observed were statistically compared using ANOVA, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level setting of 5% (α = 0.05).
RESULTS: The M2 showed higher radio-opacity, the M1 displayed intermediate radio-opacity and the M3 showed lower radio-opacity, respectively; however, all three were without significance (p > 0.05) compared with each other. The differences in radio-opacity resulted in a significant variation (p < 0.05) in the number of noticeable details in the image, which were influenced by characteristics of details, in addition to the ambient-light level.
CONCLUSIONS: The radio-opacity of materials and ambient light can affect the perception of details in digital radiographic images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  composite resins; contrast sensitivity; optical illusions; radiography; visual perception

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25629721      PMCID: PMC4628498          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20140360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  25 in total

1.  Assessing the image quality of a CCD-based digital intraoral radiography system: application of perceptibility curve test.

Authors:  Y Hayakawa; H Kitagawa; M Wakoh; K Kuroyanagi; U Welander
Journal:  Bull Tokyo Dent Coll       Date:  2000-02

2.  Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.

Authors:  Paul Deep; Demetrios Petropoulos
Journal:  J Can Dent Assoc       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.316

3.  The dynamic range of digital radiographic systems: dose reduction or risk of overexposure?

Authors:  W E R Berkhout; D A Beuger; G C H Sanderink; P F van der Stelt
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of the psychophysical properties of various intraoral film and digital systems by means of the perceptibility curve test.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; U Welander; W D McDavid; G Li; X-Q Shi; E Nakayama; M Shimizu; K Okamura; S Kanda
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.

Authors:  G Li; U Welander; K Yoshiura; X-Q Shi; W D McDavid
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 6.  Visual illusions in the interpretation of the radiographic image.

Authors:  R H Daffner
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr

7.  Influence of radiopacity of dental composites on the diagnosis of secondary caries: the correlation between objective and subjective analyses.

Authors:  A D Cruz; R G Esteves; I A V P Poiate; P P Portero; S M Almeida
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.440

8.  The perceptibility curve test applied to direct digital dental radiography.

Authors:  K Yoshiura; H Stamatakis; X Q Shi; U Welander; W D McDavid; J Kristoffersen; G Tronje
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.

Authors:  R A Cederberg; N L Frederiksen; B W Benson; J D Shulman
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Comparison of consumer grade, tablet and 6MP-displays: observer performance in detection of anatomical and pathological structures in panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Soili Kallio-Pulkkinen; Marianne Haapea; Esa Liukkonen; Sisko Huumonen; Osmo Tervonen; Miika T Nieminen
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2014-04-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of room lighting and image display device in the radiographic appearances of the endodontic treatments.

Authors:  Adriana D Cruz; Maria Cn Castro; Marcelo F Aguiar; Ludmilla S Guimarães; Cinthya C Gomes
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics.

Authors:  Thomas Hastie; Sascha Venske-Parker; Johan K M Aps
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2021-02-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.