Literature DB >> 22357883

Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years.

Judith A Malmgren1, Jay Parikh, Mary K Atwood, Henry G Kaplan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze trends in detection method related to breast cancer stage at diagnosis, treatments, and outcomes over time among 40-49-year-old women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: i This study was institutional review board approved, with a waiver of informed consent, and HIPAA compliant. A longitudinal prospective cohort study was conducted of women aged 40-49 years who had primary breast cancer, during 1990-2008, and were identified and tracked by a dedicated registry database (n = 1977). Method of detection--patient detected (PtD), physician detected (PhysD), or mammography detected (MamD)--was chart abstracted. Disease-specific survival and relapse-free survival statistics were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method for stage I-IV breast cancer.
RESULTS: A significant increase in the percentage of MamD breast cancer over time (28%-58%) and a concurrent decline in patient and physician detected (Pt/PhysD) breast cancer (73%-42%) (Pearson x(2) = 72.72, P < .001) were observed over time from 1990 to 2008, with an overall increase in lower-stage disease detection and a decrease in higher-stage disease. MamD breast cancer patients were more likely to undergo lumpectomy (67% vs 48% of Pt/PhysD breast cancer patients) and less likely to undergo modified radical mastectomy (25% vs 47% of the Pt/PhysD breast cancer patients) (P < .001). Uncorrected for stage, 13% of MamD breast cancer patients underwent surgery and chemotherapy versus 22% of Pt/PhysD breast cancer patients (P < .001), and 31% of MamD breast cancer patients underwent surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy versus 59% of Pt/PhysD breast cancer patients (x(2) = 305.13, P < .001). Analyzing invasive cancers only, 5-year relapse-free survival for MamD breast cancer patients was 92% versus 88% for Pt/PhysD patients (log-rank test, 12.47; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: Increased mammography-detected breast cancer over time coincided with lower-stage disease detection resulting in reduced treatment and lower rates of recurrence, adding factors to consider when evaluating the benefits of mammography screening of women aged 40-49 years. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357883      PMCID: PMC6940006          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111734

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  40 in total

1.  Detection of breast cancer on screening mammography allows patients to be treated with less-toxic therapy.

Authors:  Richard J Barth; Glen R Gibson; Patricia A Carney; Leila A Mott; Robert D Becher; Steven P Poplack
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study.

Authors:  Sophia Zackrisson; Ingvar Andersson; Lars Janzon; Jonas Manjer; Jens Peter Garne
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-03

3.  Prognosis and pathology of screen-detected carcinomas: how different are they?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Prue C Allgood; Stephen W Duffy; Olive Kearins; E O Sullivan; Nancy Tappenden; Matthew Wallis; Gill Lawrence
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The Gothenburg breast screening trial: first results on mortality, incidence, and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years at randomization.

Authors:  N Bjurstam; L Björneld; S W Duffy; T C Smith; E Cahlin; O Eriksson; L O Hafström; H Lingaas; J Mattsson; S Persson; C M Rudenstam; J Säve-Söderbergh
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A retrospective study of the effect of participation in screening mammography on the use of chemotherapy and breast conserving surgery.

Authors:  Andrew J Coldman; Norm Phillips; Caroline Speers
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Teresa To; Cornelia J Baines; Claus Wall
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-03       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.

Authors:  Sandra Buseman; Judy Mouchawar; Ned Calonge; Tim Byers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prospective study of long-term impact of adjuvant high-dose and conventional-dose chemotherapy on health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ciska Buijs; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Caroline M Seynaeve; Quirinus G C M van Hoesel; Elsken van der Wall; Wim J M Smit; Marianne A Nooij; Emile Voest; Pierre Hupperets; Els M TenVergert; Harm van Tinteren; Pax H B Willemse; Marian J E Mourits; Neil K Aaronson; Wendy J Post; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sue M Moss; Howard Cuckle; Andy Evans; Louise Johns; Michael Waller; Lynda Bobrow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Effect of treatment and mammography detection on breast cancer survival over time: 1990-2007.

Authors:  Henry G Kaplan; Judith A Malmgren; Mary K Atwood; Gregory S Calip
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 3.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Using Facebook Live to Advocate Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Hilda H Tso; Jay R Parikh
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Racial and ethnic disparities among state Medicaid programs for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Florence K Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Lee Rivers Mobley; Sonja Hoover; Jiantong Wang; Ingrid J Hall; Simple D Singh
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Impact of Age and Comorbidity on Cervical and Breast Cancer Literacy of African Americans, Latina, and Arab Women.

Authors:  Costellia H Talley; Karen Patricia Williams
Journal:  Nurs Clin North Am       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 1.208

7.  The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Ted A James; Jacqueline E Wade; Brian L Sprague
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Do socially deprived urban areas have lesser supplies of cancer care services?

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; Yulei He; S V Subramanian; Alan M Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Do not jump too quickly to conclusions.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Characterizing participants in the North Carolina Breast and Cervical Cancer Control Program: A retrospective review of 90,000 women.

Authors:  Sarah D Tait; Yi Ren; Cushanta C Horton; Sachiko M Oshima; Samantha M Thomas; Sherry Wright; Awanya Caesar; Jennifer K Plichta; E Shelley Hwang; Rachel A Greenup; Laura H Rosenberger; Gayle D DiLalla; Carolyn S Menendez; Lisa Tolnitch; Terry Hyslop; Debi Nelson; Oluwadamilola M Fayanju
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 6.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.