Literature DB >> 26799535

The impact of mammographic screening on the surgical management of breast cancer.

Ted A James1,2, Jacqueline E Wade1, Brian L Sprague1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mammographic screening has been shown to result in downward stage migration, reflected by smaller tumor sizes and less extensive nodal involvement. National guidelines restrict screening recommendations in women age 40-49. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the specific impact of mammographic screening patterns on the surgical management of breast cancer in women aged 40-49.
METHODS: The study is a population-based retrospective review of the Vermont Breast Cancer Surveillance System of women aged 40-49 with a diagnosis of breast cancer. Tumor stage and related characteristics at the time of diagnosis, as well as the type of surgical intervention performed were recorded for women presenting with screen-detected versus non-screen-detected breast cancer.
RESULTS: Screen-detected breast cancers in women aged 40-49 were associated with a greater incidence of DCIS, smaller invasive tumor size, fewer cases of positive nodes, and higher rates of breast conservation compared to non-screened women presenting with symptomatic disease.
CONCLUSIONS: Mammographic screening is associated with less aggressive surgical treatment of breast cancer including higher rates of breast conservation. The observed changes in surgical management should factor into individual decision-making regarding screening mammography. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:496-500.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; breast conserving surgery; mammogram; quality; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26799535      PMCID: PMC4844800          DOI: 10.1002/jso.24184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  39 in total

Review 1.  Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Elizabeth Moye; Sankey Williams; Jesse A Berlin; Eileen E Reynolds
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 2.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2009: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Vilma Cokkinides; Otis W Brawley
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Karla Kerlikowske; Andrew Loh; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-05       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Insights from the breast cancer screening trials: how screening affects the natural history of breast cancer and implications for evaluating service screening programs.

Authors:  László Tabár; Amy Ming-Fang Yen; Wendy Yi-Ying Wu; Sam Li-Sheng Chen; Sherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu; Jean Ching-Yuan Fann; May Mei-Sheng Ku; Robert A Smith; Stephen W Duffy; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol H Lee; D David Dershaw; Daniel Kopans; Phil Evans; Barbara Monsees; Debra Monticciolo; R James Brenner; Lawrence Bassett; Wendie Berg; Stephen Feig; Edward Hendrick; Ellen Mendelson; Carl D'Orsi; Edward Sickles; Linda Warren Burhenne
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among women in metropolitan areas of the United States by county-level commuting time to work and use of public transportation, 2004 and 2006.

Authors:  Steven S Coughlin; Jessica King
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Long-term morbidity of sentinel node biopsy versus complete axillary dissection for unilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Rebecca Crane-Okada; Robert A Wascher; David Elashoff; Armando E Giuliano
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Hartwig Ziegler; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Morbidity comparison of sentinel lymph node biopsy versus conventional axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer patients: results of the sentinella-GIVOM Italian randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  P Del Bianco; G Zavagno; P Burelli; G Scalco; L Barutta; P Carraro; P Pietrarota; G Meneghini; T Morbin; G Tacchetti; P Pecoraro; V Belardinelli; G L De Salvo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  6 in total

1.  Endocrine Therapy for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast with Breast Conserving Surgery (BCS) and Radiotherapy (RT): a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanli Yan; Long Zhang; Li Tan; Xiaowei Ma; Yong Zhang; Shuai Shao; Jiaxin Liu; Chaofan Xue; Zongfang Li; Xiaozhi Zhang; Emmanuel Kwateng Drokow; Xiaoting Shi; Juan Ren
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Breast cancer and the black swan.

Authors:  Michael Retsky; Romano Demicheli; William Hrushesky; Ted James; Rick Rogers; Michael Baum; Jayant S Vaidya; Osaro Erhabor; Patrice Forget
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2020-05-28

3.  Survival Rates of Breast Cancer Patients Aged 40 to 49 Years according to Detection Modality in Korea: Screening Ultrasound versus Mammography.

Authors:  So Yeon Won; Hyung Seok Park; Eun Kyung Kim; Seung Il Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Vivian Youngjean Park; Seho Park; Min Jung Kim; Young Up Cho; Byeong Woo Park
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  The Role of Surgical Axillary Staging Prior to Immediate Breast Reconstruction in the Era of De-Escalation of Axillary Management in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Miriam Svensson; Looket Dihge
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  Initial and ten-year treatment patterns among 11,000 breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery-an analysis of German claims data.

Authors:  Miriam Heinig; Franziska Heinze; Sarina Schwarz; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Invasive lobular carcinoma mammographic findings: correlation with age, breast composition, and tumour size.

Authors:  Corrado Tagliati; Federico Cerimele; Antonietta Di Martino; Fabrizio Capone; Marialuisa Di Matteo; Nevia Caputo; Gabriella Lucidi Pressanti; Ying Mingliang; Silvia Baldassarre; Andrea Giovagnoni; Gian Marco Giuseppetti
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.