Literature DB >> 12518359

Mammography screening matters for young women with breast carcinoma: evidence of downstaging among 42-49-year-old women with a history of previous mammography screening.

Sandra Buseman1, Judy Mouchawar, Ned Calonge, Tim Byers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast carcinoma is the leading cause of death for women between the ages of 40 and 49 years, yet questions linger regarding the effectiveness of screening mammography in reducing mortality rates among women of this age. In the current study, the authors report on the association between cancer stage at diagnosis and a history of mammography screening in a clinical setting that has emphasized informed choice regarding mammography screening for women in this age group.
METHODS: Previous mammographic screening for 247 breast cancer patients 42-49 years of age who were diagnosed at Kaiser Permanente Colorado during 1994-2000 was evaluated relative to cancer stage. Cancer stage was dichotomized into early (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] Stages 0 and I) and late (AJCC Stages II-IV) and previous screening was defined as at least one normal screening mammogram within 24 months before the breast carcinoma diagnosis.
RESULTS: Women who were screened were less likely to be diagnosed at a late stage than were women who were not screened (40% vs. 52% late stage, respectively). Adjusted for age, year of diagnosis, and family history, screened women were 0.56 (95% confidence interval = 0.32-0.97) times as likely as unscreened women to be diagnosed at a late stage.
CONCLUSIONS: Women 42-49 of years with breast carcinoma who undergo regular screening mammography have a more favorable cancer stage than do women with breast carcinoma who do not undergo regular screening. This downstaging of breast carcinoma is likely to translate into improved breast carcinoma survival resulting from screening mammography for women 40-49 years of age. Copyright 2003 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12518359     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  6 in total

1.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

2.  Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  Judith A Malmgren; Jay Parikh; Mary K Atwood; Henry G Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Delay in diagnostic testing after abnormal mammography in low-income women.

Authors:  Debra Wujcik; Yu Shyr; Ming Li; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington; Usha Menon; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.172

4.  The effects of navigation and types of neighborhoods on timely follow-up of abnormal mammogram among black women.

Authors:  Sage Kim; Yamile Molina; Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Nerida Berrios; Jenny Guadamuz; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  Med Res Arch       Date:  2015-07

5.  Obesity, gynecological factors, and abnormal mammography follow-up in minority and medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann S Lin; Ana Grau; Veronica Wilson; Victoria Champion; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  False-positive reduction in mammography using multiscale spatial Weber law descriptor and support vector machines.

Authors:  Muhammad Hussain
Journal:  Neural Comput Appl       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 5.606

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.