Literature DB >> 17290404

A retrospective study of the effect of participation in screening mammography on the use of chemotherapy and breast conserving surgery.

Andrew J Coldman1, Norm Phillips, Caroline Speers.   

Abstract

A population sample was obtained from the British Columbia (BC) Cancer Registry of all women diagnosed with a first breast cancer in 2002 who were resident in Greater Vancouver or Greater Victoria, BC. Information on treatment and prognostic factors were obtained from source records. The study group was linked to the records of the Screening Mammography Program of BC to identify screening histories on women prior to diagnosis. Logistic regression was used to determine the relationship between screening participation and treatment and to predict treatment use from prognostic factors. Fifteen hundred and eighty-nine women with breast cancer were included in the study and 1,071 (67%) had participated in screening prior to diagnosis: 786 (49%) had been screened within the 30 months prior to their diagnosis (regular participants). Breast conserving surgery (BCS) rates were higher (OR = 2.3, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy use lower (OR = 0.53, p < 0.001) among regular participants compared with nonparticipants after adjustment for age. A predictive model based on the distribution of prognostic factors between participants provided estimates of OR = 1.47 and OR = 0.54 for BCS and chemotherapy, respectively, and adjustment for self-selection changed the predicted values to OR = 1.16 and OR = 0.67, respectively. Participation in screening produced a considerable change in the use of chemotherapy but less on BCS use. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17290404     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.22545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  8 in total

1.  Effect of mammography screening on surgical treatment for breast cancer: a nationwide analysis of hospitalization rates in Germany 2005-2009.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Vanessa Kääb-Sanyal; Hans-Werner Hense; Nikolaus Becker; Oliver Kuss
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Stage, treatment and outcomes for patients with breast cancer in British Columbia in 2002: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ashley Davidson; Stephen Chia; Robert Olson; Alan Nichol; Caroline Speers; Andy J Coldman; Chris Bajdik; Ryan Woods; Scott Tyldesley
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-11-07

3.  Impact of mammography detection on the course of breast cancer in women aged 40-49 years.

Authors:  Judith A Malmgren; Jay Parikh; Mary K Atwood; Henry G Kaplan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Marrying Story with Science: The Impact of Outdated and Inconsistent Breast Cancer Screening Practices in Canada.

Authors:  Jennie Dale; Michelle Di Tomaso; Victoria Gay
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Differences in Breast Cancer Characteristics by Mammography Screening Participation or Non-Participation.

Authors:  Bettina Braun; Laura Khil; Joke Tio; Barbara Krause-Bergmann; Andrea Fuhs; Oliver Heidinger; Hans-Werner Hense
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Breast cancer screening: Impact on care pathways.

Authors:  Delphine Lefeuvre; Nathalie Catajar; Christine Le Bihan Benjamin; Norbert Ifrah; Frédéric De Bels; Jérôme Viguier; Philippe Jean Bousquet
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 3.109

8.  Initial and ten-year treatment patterns among 11,000 breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery-an analysis of German claims data.

Authors:  Miriam Heinig; Franziska Heinze; Sarina Schwarz; Ulrike Haug
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.