Literature DB >> 12204013

The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.

Anthony B Miller1, Teresa To, Cornelia J Baines, Claus Wall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of breast cancer screening in women age 40 to 49 years remains controversial.
OBJECTIVE: To compare breast cancer mortality in 40- to 49-year-old women who received either 1) screening with annual mammography, breast physical examination, and instruction on breast self-examination on 4 or 5 occasions or 2) community care after a single breast physical examination and instruction on breast self-examination.
DESIGN: Individually randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: 15 Canadian centers. PARTICIPANTS: 50 430 volunteers age 40 to 49 years, recruited from January 1980 to March 1985, who were not pregnant, had no previous breast cancer diagnosis, and had not had mammography in the preceding 12 months.
INTERVENTIONS: Breast physical examination and instruction on breast self-examination preceded random assignment of 25 214 women to receive mammography and annual mammography, breast physical examination, and breast self-examination and 25 216 women to receive usual community care with annual follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: Verified breast cancer incidence and cohort mortality through 31 December 1993 and deaths from breast cancer through 30 June 1996.
RESULTS: The 105 breast cancer deaths in the mammography group and 108 breast cancer deaths in the usual care group yielded a cumulative rate ratio, adjusted for mammography done outside the study, of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.80 to 1.40). A total of 592 cases of invasive breast cancer and 71 cases of in situ breast cancer were diagnosed by 31 December 1993 in the mammography group compared with 552 and 29 cases, respectively, in the usual care group. The expected proportions of nonpalpable and small invasive tumors were detected on mammography.
CONCLUSION: After 11 to 16 years of follow-up, four or five annual screenings with mammography, breast physical examination, and breast self-examination had not reduced breast cancer mortality compared with usual community care after a single breast physical examination and instruction on breast self-examination. The study data show that true effects of 20% or greater are unlikely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12204013     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-5_part_1-200209030-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  78 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of clinical breast assessment-based screening in rural Egypt.

Authors:  Adel Denewer; Osama Hussein; Omar Farouk; Waleed Elnahas; Ashraf Khater; Aiman El-Saed
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Depression as a risk factor for underuse of mammography.

Authors:  Hillary R Bogner; Marsha N Wittink
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

Authors:  Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Connor Gorber; Michel Joffres; James Dickinson; Harminder Singh; Gabriela Lewin; Richard Birtwhistle; Donna Fitzpatrick-Lewis; Nicole Hodgson; Donna Ciliska; Mary Gauld; Yan Yun Liu
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Design of cancer screening trials/randomized trials for evaluation of cancer screening.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Time spent in the United States and breast cancer screening behaviors among ethnically diverse immigrant women: evidence for acculturation?

Authors:  William Michael Brown; Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2006-10

6.  Imagining the future of photoacoustic mammography.

Authors:  Simone van der Burg
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 7.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors:  M G Marmot; D G Altman; D A Cameron; J A Dewar; S G Thompson; M Wilcox
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 8.  Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Authors:  Mackenzie S Fuller; Christoph I Lee; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.456

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.