Literature DB >> 34687699

Active inference, selective attention, and the cocktail party problem.

Emma Holmes1, Thomas Parr2, Timothy D Griffiths3, Karl J Friston2.   

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new generative model for an active inference account of preparatory and selective attention, in the context of a classic 'cocktail party' paradigm. In this setup, pairs of words are presented simultaneously to the left and right ears and an instructive spatial cue directs attention to the left or right. We use this generative model to test competing hypotheses about the way that human listeners direct preparatory and selective attention. We show that assigning low precision to words at attended-relative to unattended-locations can explain why a listener reports words from a competing sentence. Under this model, temporal changes in sensory precision were not needed to account for faster reaction times with longer cue-target intervals, but were necessary to explain ramping effects on event-related potentials (ERPs)-resembling the contingent negative variation (CNV)-during the preparatory interval. These simulations reveal that different processes are likely to underlie the improvement in reaction times and the ramping of ERPs that are associated with spatial cueing.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active inference; Cocktail party listening; Preparatory attention; Selective attention; Spatial attention; Temporal attention

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34687699      PMCID: PMC8643962          DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  74 in total

1.  A selective review of selective attention research from the past century.

Authors:  J Driver
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2001-02

2.  "Probing" the nature of the CNV.

Authors:  B Rockstroh; M Müller; M Wagner; R Cohen; T Elbert
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-10

3.  Attention Cycles.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Cortical oscillations and speech processing: emerging computational principles and operations.

Authors:  Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Cortical slow potential changes in man related to interstimulus intevval and to pre-trial prediction of interstimulus interval.

Authors:  D W McAdam; J R Knott; C S Rebert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  Not All Predictions Are Equal: "What" and "When" Predictions Modulate Activity in Auditory Cortex through Different Mechanisms.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Caspar M Schwiedrzik; Thomas Thesen; Werner Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Anna C Nobre; Charles E Schroeder; Karl J Friston; Lucia Melloni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Auditory attentional control and selection during cocktail party listening.

Authors:  Kevin T Hill; Lee M Miller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference.

Authors:  Karl J Friston; Thomas Parr; Bert de Vries
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-31

9.  Working memory, attention, and salience in active inference.

Authors:  Thomas Parr; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Swinging at a cocktail party: voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice.

Authors:  Ingrid S Johnsrude; Allison Mackey; Hélène Hakyemez; Elizabeth Alexander; Heather P Trang; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.