Literature DB >> 22301638

Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.

G S Liedke1, E L Delamare, M B Vizzotto, H L D da Silveira, J R Prietsch, V Dutra, H E D da Silveira.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare cephalometric measurements obtained from conventional cephalograms with total and half-skull synthesized cone beam CT (CBCT) cephalograms.
METHODS: Cephalometric analyses of 30 clinically symmetric patients were conducted by a calibrated examiner on conventional and CBCT-synthesized cephalograms (total, right and left). Reproducibility was investigated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Bland-Altman analysis was used to assess the agreement of the measurements from each factor obtained by conventional, total, right and left CBCT-synthesized cephalograms.
RESULTS: The ICC was above 0.9 for most of the 40 cephalometric factors analysed, revealing similar levels of reproducibility. When the measurements obtained from conventional and CBCT-synthesized cephalograms were compared, the Bland-Altman analysis showed a strong agreement between them.
CONCLUSIONS: Half-skull CBCT-synthesized cephalograms offer the same diagnostic performance and equivalent reproducibility in terms of cephalometric analysis as observed in conventional and total CBCT-synthesized cephalograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301638      PMCID: PMC3520376          DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/22287302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  34 in total

1.  The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results.

Authors:  A Kamoen; L Dermaut; R Verbeeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.

Authors:  James K Mah; Robert A Danforth; Axel Bumann; David Hatcher
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2003-10

3.  Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery.

Authors:  Y Nakagawa; K Kobayashi; H Ishii; A Mishima; H Ishii; K Asada; K Ishibashi
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Three-dimensional cephalometry using helical computer tomography: measurement error caused by head inclination.

Authors:  Kumiko Togashi; Hideki Kitaura; Koichi Yonetsu; Noriaki Yoshida; Takashi Nakamura
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit.

Authors:  J B Ludlow; L E Davies-Ludlow; S L Brooks
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.419

6.  Clinical application of a new cone-beam computerized tomography system to assess multiple two-dimensional images for the preoperative treatment planning of maxillary implants: case reports.

Authors:  Shuichi Sato; Yoshinori Arai; Koji Shinoda; Koichi Ito
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.677

7.  Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.

Authors:  D Schulze; M Heiland; H Thurmann; G Adam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Influence of a programme of professional calibration in the variability of landmark identification using cone beam computed tomography-synthesized and conventional radiographic cephalograms.

Authors:  E L Delamare; G S Liedke; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J L D Ribeiro; H E D Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis.

Authors:  A Richardson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1966-09

10.  Precision in cephalometric landmark identification.

Authors:  A E Stabrun; K Danielsen
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of linear measurements between CBCT orthogonally synthesized cephalograms and conventional cephalograms.

Authors:  S Yang; D G Liu; Y Gu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Effect of changing the head position on accuracy of transverse measurements of the maxillofacial region made on cone beam computed tomography and conventional posterior-anterior cephalograms.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amirfarhang Miresmaeili; Nasrin Farhadian; Sepideh Falah-Kooshki; Payam Amini; Najmeh Mollaie
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT.

Authors:  Pegah Naji; Noura A Alsufyani; Manuel O Lagravère
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Influence of tooth loss on mandibular morphology: A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Shaimaa-Mohamed Fouda; Mohammed M Gad; Maha El Tantawi; Jorma I Virtanen; Kirsi Sipila; Aune Raustia
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  The Effects of Additional Filtration on Image Quality and Radiation Dose in Cone Beam CT: An In Vivo Preliminary Investigation.

Authors:  Jan Houfrar; Bjorn Ludwig; Dirk Bister; Manuel Nienkemper; Ciamak Abkai; Adith Venugopal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Cephalometric Angular Measurements of the Mandible Using Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Scans in Koreans.

Authors:  Yong Hyun Kim; Seok Joo Kang; Hook Sun
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.