Literature DB >> 15313998

Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography.

D Schulze1, M Heiland, H Thurmann, G Adam.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Radiation doses were determined to balance risks against usefulness of the different modalities available for the imaging of the facial skeleton.
METHODS: An Alderson Rando Phantom, armed with lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLDs) was exposed using a set of four conventional radiographs (orbital view, modified Waters view, orthopantomography, skull posterior--anterior 0 degrees ), two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (NewTom 9000 and Siremobil Iso-C3D), and multislice computed tomography (CT) modalities (Somatom VolumeZoom and Somatom Sensation 16). TLDs from 14 well defined anatomical sites lying within the primary beam as well as the TLD corresponding to the thyroid gland were evaluated.
RESULTS: Multislice CT showed the highest exposure values. Exposure levels of the CBCT systems lay between CT and conventional radiography. Dose measurement for the 16-slice CT revealed nearly the same radiation exposure as the 4-slice system when adapted examination protocols were used.
CONCLUSIONS: Selection of the most appropriate imaging modality should be performed in view of the delivered doses, required image quality and information and the clinical circumstances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15313998     DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/28403350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  78 in total

1.  Comparative study between conventional and cone beam CT-synthesized half and total skull cephalograms.

Authors:  G S Liedke; E L Delamare; M B Vizzotto; H L D da Silveira; J R Prietsch; V Dutra; H E D da Silveira
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Imaging of ancient Egyptian mummies' temporal bones with digital volume tomography.

Authors:  C V Dalchow; C Schmidt; J Harbort; R Knecht; U Grzyska; A Muenscher
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  R Olszewski; L Frison; M Wisniewski; J M Denis; S Vynckier; G Cosnard; F Zech; H Reychler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Comparison of cone-beam and conventional multislice computed tomography for image-guided dental implant planning.

Authors:  Paul W Poeschl; Nina Schmidt; Godoberto Guevara-Rojas; Rudolf Seemann; Rolf Ewers; Harald T Zipko; Kurt Schicho
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Digital method for quantification of circumferential periodontal bone level using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Jonathan Fleiner; Christian Hannig; Dirk Schulze; Andres Stricker; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice.

Authors:  Bart Vandenberghe; Reinhilde Jacobs; Hilde Bosmans
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Periodontal surgery in furcation-involved maxillary molars revisited--an introduction of guidelines for comprehensive treatment.

Authors:  Clemens Walter; Roland Weiger; Nicola Ursula Zitzmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography.

Authors:  F Jadu; M J Yaffe; E W N Lam
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and conventional multislice spiral tomography in sheep mandibular condyle fractures.

Authors:  Y Sirin; K Guven; S Horasan; S Sencan
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Correlation of tuned aperture computed tomography with conventional computed tomography for evaluation of osseous healing in calvarial defects.

Authors:  Madhu K Nair; Umadevi P Nair; Ali Seyedain; Robert Gassner; Nicholas Piesco; Mark Mooney; Sudhakar Ganta; Sudha Agarwal
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2006-08-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.