Literature DB >> 20419035

Revisiting the Impact of Inversions in Evolution: From Population Genetic Markers to Drivers of Adaptive Shifts and Speciation?

Ary A Hoffmann1, Loren H Rieseberg.   

Abstract

There is a growing appreciation that chromosome inversions affect rates of adaptation, speciation, and the evolution of sex chromosomes. Comparative genomic studies have identified many new paracentric inversion polymorphisms. Population models suggest that inversions can spread by reducing recombination between alleles that independently increase fitness, without epistasis or coadaptation. Areas of linkage disequilibrium extend across large inversions but may be interspersed by areas with little disequilibrium. Genes located within inversions are associated with a variety of traits including those involved in climatic adaptation. Inversion polymorphisms may contribute to speciation by generating underdominance owing to inviable gametes, but an alternative view gaining support is that inversions facilitate speciation by reducing recombination, protecting genomic regions from introgression. Likewise, inversions may facilitate the evolution of sex chromosomes by reducing recombination between sex determining alleles and alleles with sex-specific effects. However, few genes within inversions responsible for fitness effects or speciation have been identified.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 20419035      PMCID: PMC2858385          DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst        ISSN: 1543-592X            Impact factor:   13.915


  119 in total

1.  Testing for asymmetrical gene flow in a Drosophila melanogaster body-size cline.

Authors:  W Jason Kennington; Julia Gockel; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Larval polytene chromosomes of black flies (Simulium) from Thailand. I. Comparison among five species in the subgenus Gomphostilbia enderlein.

Authors:  Chaliow Kuvangkadilok; Chainarong Boonkemtong; Suwannee Phayuhasena; Visut Baimai
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.082

3.  Models of general frequency-dependent selection and mating-interaction effects and the analysis of selection patterns in Drosophila inversion polymorphisms.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Gonzalo Alvarez
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-23       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The adaptive hypothesis of clinal variation revisited: single-locus clines as a result of spatially restricted gene flow.

Authors:  Anti Vasemägi
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evaluation of the genomic extent of effects of fixed inversion differences on intraspecific variation and interspecific gene flow in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis.

Authors:  Carlos A Machado; Tamara S Haselkorn; Mohamed A F Noor
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The association between inversion In(3R)Payne and clinally varying traits in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Rako; A R Anderson; C M Sgrò; A J Stocker; A A Hoffmann
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.082

7.  Hybrid zones and the genetic architecture of a barrier to gene flow between two sunflower species.

Authors:  L H Rieseberg; J Whitton; K Gardner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Evidence for inversion polymorphism related to sympatric host race formation in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Joseph B Roethele; Kenneth Filchak; Julie Niedbalski; Jeanne Romero-Severson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Nonclinality of molecular variation implicates selection in maintaining a morphological cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Gockel; W J Kennington; A Hoffmann; D B Goldstein; L Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Cloning of the breakpoints of a de novo inversion of chromosome 8, inv (8)(p11.2q23.1) in a patient with Ambras syndrome.

Authors:  M Tadin-Strapps; D Warburton; F A M Baumeister; S G Fischer; J Yonan; T C Gilliam; A M Christiano
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.636

View more
  196 in total

1.  Where's the money? Inversions, genes, and the hunt for genomic targets of selection.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Andrew Kern
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Divergence hitchhiking and the spread of genomic isolation during ecological speciation-with-gene-flow.

Authors:  Sara Via
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Ecological genomics of Anopheles gambiae along a latitudinal cline: a population-resequencing approach.

Authors:  Changde Cheng; Bradley J White; Colince Kamdem; Keithanne Mockaitis; Carlo Costantini; Matthew W Hahn; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.

Authors:  Rafael F Guerrero; François Rousset; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Genomics and the future of conservation genetics.

Authors:  Fred W Allendorf; Paul A Hohenlohe; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 6.  Speciation genetics: current status and evolving approaches.

Authors:  Jochen B W Wolf; Johan Lindell; Niclas Backström
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Segregation distortion causes large-scale differences between male and female genomes in hybrid ants.

Authors:  Jonna Kulmuni; Bernhard Seifert; Pekka Pamilo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Chromosomal inversions and ecotypic differentiation in Anopheles gambiae: the perspective from whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  R Rebecca Love; Aaron M Steele; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Sékou F Traore; Scott J Emrich; Michael C Fontaine; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Expression quantitative trait locus mapping across water availability environments reveals contrasting associations with genomic features in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  David B Lowry; Tierney L Logan; Luca Santuari; Christian S Hardtke; James H Richards; Leah J DeRose-Wilson; John K McKay; Saunak Sen; Thomas E Juenger
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  Inside the supergene of the bird with four sexes.

Authors:  Donna L Maney; Jennifer R Merritt; Mackenzie R Prichard; Brent M Horton; Soojin V Yi
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.587

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.